Ideology and Language: Sexism in Language

Publish Year: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 516

This Paper With 13 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

CRSTCONF01_791

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 27 اسفند 1394

Abstract:

Language reflects the social powers that one group has held in many areas of life. Wherever there is a power relationship or inequality of one side, language is a means of control which can be analyzed based on Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). CDA shows the hidden effect of features of a text by deconstructing linguistic elements. The present study qualitatively reveals that the relations of different sexes are much like the power relations which are controlled by discourse and linguistic features. It is an attempt to make it clear how linguistic elements and discourse structures explicitly and implicitly function in classifying reality, in producing, reorganizing and enforcing certain ideas, in persuading others and in controlling relations of power. So, it focuses on the social as well as grammatical aspects of the texts. The article also aims at discovering the way male and female interact ideologically with a number of discursive structures such as: nominals, passive structures, and address forms. The result shows that some ideologies about men and women are concerned with these structures in both English and Persian. It also makes it clear that women use these structures more than men do. They use more transformations to reorganize the experience and to have an indirect and implicit speech. Using sexist language creates an image of a society where men and women have unequal social, political and economic status.

Authors

Mohammad Hassan Ghaane

Fars Department of Education

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Beizaie, B. (1989). eshghal (occupancy). Tehran: Roshangaran. ...
  • Bloom, D. & Talwalkar, S. (1977). Critical discourse analysis and ...
  • Boas, F. (1964). Linguistic and ethnology. In Hymes (ed.), Language ...
  • Chastain, K. (1988). Developing S ec ond-Language Skills. New york: ...
  • Darvish, A. R. (2000). motevaled-e mah-e mehr (Born Under Libra). ...
  • Douglas Brown, H. (1994). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. ...
  • Eckert, P. (1989). The whole women sex and gender differences ...
  • Ehrlich, S. & King, R.(1994). Feminist meanings and the (de) ...
  • Fairclough, N. (1989). Language And Power. London: Longman. ...
  • Fairclough, N. (2010a). Critical Discourse Analysis: the critical study of ...
  • Fishman, J. A. (1982). Whorfianism of the thid kind: Ethnolinguistic ...
  • Franks, B. (2010). Is the English Language sexist? https : ...
  • Graham, A. (1975). The making of a nonsexis dictionary. In ...
  • He, Guimei (2010). An Analysis of Sexism in English. China ...
  • , No. 3, pp. 332-335, May 2010. Finland. ...
  • Hodge, R. & Kress, G. (1993). Language As Ideology. London: ...
  • Sherryl Kleinman (2002). Why Sexist Language Matters?. Qualitative Sociology, Vol. ...
  • Kress, K. (1985). Ideological structures in discourse. In Van Dijk, ...
  • Key, M. R. (1975). Male/Female Language. Metuchen: Scarecrow Press, Inc. ...
  • Lardiere, D. (1992). On the linguistic shaping of thought: Another ...
  • Lucy, J. L. (1992). Language diversity and thought: A reformulation ...
  • Lyons, J. (1981). Language and Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge ...
  • Paul Gee, J. (2014). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory ...
  • Afkhami, B. (2000). showkaran (Hemlock). Tehran: Tofigh Afarin. Beizaie, B. ...
  • Priestley, J.B. (1995). When we are married. In Priestley, J.B. ...
  • Sampson, G. (1985). Schools of Linguistics: Competition & Evolution. London: ...
  • Seidell, G. (1985). Political discourse analysis. In Van Dijk, T.A. ...
  • Shaw, G.B. (1965). Pygmalion. In Hamleyn, P. (ed.), The Complete ...
  • Steinberg, D. (1982). P sycholingui stics : Language, Mind and ...
  • Thorne, B. & Henley, N. (1975). Difference and dominance: An ...
  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1985). Introduction: The role of discourse ...
  • Whorf, L. (1956). Language, Thought and Reality. In Carrol, J.B. ...
  • Wierzbicka, A. (1986). Does language reflect culture? Evidence from Ausrtalian ...
  • Wodak, R. 2006. Images in/and news in a globalised world. ...
  • Wodak, R. and Weiss, G. 2004. Visions, ideologies and utopias ...
  • Wood, Julia T. (1999). Gendered Lives: C ommunication, Gender and ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع