CIVILICA We Respect the Science
Publisher of Iranian Journals and Conference Proceedings
Paper
title

Comparison the Lefort colpocleisis surgery and pessary insertion clinical outcoms in patient with advanced pelvic organ prolapse

Credit to Download: 0 | Page Numbers 1 | Abstract Views: 63
Year: 2019
COI code: DTOGIMED03_066
Paper Language: English

How to Download This Paper

For Downloading the Fulltext of CIVILICA papers please visit the orginal Persian Section of website.

Authors Comparison the Lefort colpocleisis surgery and pessary insertion clinical outcoms in patient with advanced pelvic organ prolapse

  Maryam Hajihashemy - Assistant professor, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences,Beheshti Hospital, Isfahan, Iran
  Elham Gholamian - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  Samaneh Tarokh - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  Fedyeh Haghollahi - Vali ASR Reproductive Health Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract:

Background and Aim : The women with utero vaginal prolapse are managed, by surgery or pessaryplacement. This study aimed to compare the Lefort colpocleisis surgery and pessary insertion clinicaloutcomes in patient with advanced pelvic organ prolapse(POP).Methods : The present study is a non-randomized, semi experimental clinical trial. The population understudy was 110 elderly women who had a diagnosis of stage III or higher pelvic organ prolapse accordingto the POP quantification (POP-Q) system who have been undergoing Le Fort colpocleisis surgery orpessary placement in University Clinics (beheshti hospital or alzahra hospital) from November 2016 toJanuary 2018. One- hundred-ten candidate entered the study into two groups of intervention (Le fortColpocleisis surgery, n=55) and control (Pessary placement, n=55). All patients completed the Pelvic FloorDistress Inventory Questionnaire (PFDI-20) before and six months after the intervention. The mainoutcome measurements were the pelvic prolapse manifestation symptom and clinical outcomes in twogroups.Results : The mean age in control and intervention group were 68.98((± 8.79) and 64.76(± 7.04) years old,respectively (p=0.006). The prolapse symptoms was improved after the treatment in each group (p<0.001)But,In the two groups of control and intervention ,the total of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory score (PFDI)was no difference after the end of treatment (P=0.19)Conclusion : A strategy of pessary treatment or a strategy with surgery both seems to be effective optionsfor the treatment of elderly women with stage III or higher of pelvic organ prolapse(POP).These outcomescan help with treatment options and allow better guidance to elderly patients with symptomatic POP in thetreatment decision process.

Keywords:

Modified LeFort Colpocleisis, Pelvic floor reconstructive surgery, Pelvic organ prolapse, pessary

Perma Link

https://www.civilica.com/Paper-DTOGIMED03-DTOGIMED03_066.html
COI code: DTOGIMED03_066

how to cite to this paper:

If you want to refer to this article in your research, you can easily use the following in the resources and references section:
Hajihashemy, Maryam; Elham Gholamian; Samaneh Tarokh & Fedyeh Haghollahi, 2019, Comparison the Lefort colpocleisis surgery and pessary insertion clinical outcoms in patient with advanced pelvic organ prolapse, 3rd debatable topics on obstetrics gynecology & infertility, تهران, دانشگاه علوم پزشكي و خدمات بهداشتي و درماني شهيد بهشتي, https://www.civilica.com/Paper-DTOGIMED03-DTOGIMED03_066.htmlInside the text, wherever referred to or an achievement of this article is mentioned, after mentioning the article, inside the parental, the following specifications are written.
First Time: (Hajihashemy, Maryam; Elham Gholamian; Samaneh Tarokh & Fedyeh Haghollahi, 2019)
Second and more: (Hajihashemy; Gholamian; Tarokh & Haghollahi, 2019)
For a complete overview of how to citation please review the following CIVILICA Guide (Citation)