Introduction of research articles and disciplinary influences based on interactive metadiscourse markers

Publish Year: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 554

This Paper With 15 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ELSCONF03_255

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 19 اردیبهشت 1395

Abstract:

Metadiscourse refers to the evolving text, to the writer, and to the imagined readers of that text. It is based on a view of writing as a social engagement. This study draws on an interpersonal model of metadiscourse to examine disciplinary influences on the use of interactive metadiscourse in the Introduction sections of research articles. The study examined the distributions of interactive metadiscourse markers in a corpus of 120 RAs represented four academic disciplines (30 from each discipline). Physics and medicine were selected from hard disciplines and Applied linguistics and Economics from soft disciplines to shed some light on the ways academic writers deploy these resources in a high stakes research genre to persuade readers in their own discourse community. No statistically significant difference was achieved by functional-contextual analysis in the use of interactive metadiscourse markers across disciplines. The analysis suggested how academic writers use language to offer a credible representation of their work in different fields, and thus how metadiscourse can be seen as a means of uncovering something of the rhetorical and social distinctiveness of disciplinary communities. The findings are attributable to the knowledge-knower structures characteristic of the disciplines and the epistemologies underlying the research paradigms. These findings might have implications for the teaching of academic writing and for novice writers who would like to publish their research in academic journals.

Authors

Reza Abdi

Associate Professor, ELT Department, Faculty of Humanities, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Iran.

Parisa Ahmadi

ELT Instructor, Payam Noor University, Ardabil Branch, Iran.

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Abdi, R. (2002). Interpersonal metadiscourse : An indicator of interaction ...
  • Abdi, R. (2009). Projecting cultural identity through metadiscourse marking; A ...
  • Abdi, R. (2011). Metadiscourse strategies in research articles; A study ...
  • Abdi, R., Tavangar Rizi, M., & Tavakoli, M. (2010). The ...
  • Adel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 Englislh. Philadelphia: ...
  • Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity ...
  • Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and ...
  • Crismore, A. (1984). The rhetoric of textbooks metadiscours. Journal of ...
  • Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with readers: Metadiscourse as rhetorical ac. ...
  • Crismore, A., & Farnsworth, R. (1990). Metadiscourse in popular _ ...
  • Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., & Steffensen, M. (1993). Metadiscourse in ...
  • Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal ...
  • Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative ...
  • Farrokhi, F. & Ashrafi, S. (2009). Textual metadiscourse resources in ...
  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms ...
  • Harris, R. A. (1991). Rhetoric of science. College English, 53(3), ...
  • Harwood, N. (2005). Nowhere has anyone attempted...In this article I ...
  • Hoey, M. (2001). Textual interaction: An introduction to written discourse ...
  • Hyland, K., (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAP textbooks. ...
  • Hyland, K, (1999). Talking to students: Metadiscourse in introductory coursebooks. ...
  • Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. ...
  • Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. ...
  • Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscou rse. Exploring interaction in writing. London: ...
  • Hyland, K., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2002). EAP: Issues and directions. ...
  • Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: ...
  • Jalilifar, A. R. & Shooshtari, Z. G. (2011). Metadiscourse awarenes ...
  • Mauranen, A. (1993). Contrastive ESP rhetori: Metatext in Finnish- English ...
  • Myles, J. (2002) Second language writing and researc. The writing ...
  • Rahman, M. (2004). Aiding the reader: The use of metalinguistic ...
  • Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: ...
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1998). Language is not a physical object. Joural ...
  • S alager-Meyer, F. (1999). Referential behavior in scientific writing: A ...
  • Svalberg, A. M-L. (2007). Language _ and language learning. Language ...
  • Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English for specific purpose in ...
  • Swales, J. (2001). Metatalk in American Academic Talk. Journal of ...
  • Thompson, G. (2001). Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue ...
  • Thompson, G., & Thetela, P. (1995). The sound of one ...
  • Vande Kopple, W. J. (1985). Some explanatory discourse On metadiscours. ...
  • Vande Kopple, W. J. (2002). Metadiscoue e, discourse, and issues ...
  • Ventola, E., & Mauranen, A. (1991). :Non-native writing and native ...
  • Widdowson, H. G. (1984). Eplorations in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع