Web Literacy for Evaluating Credibility of Web Information: Issues and Considerations

Publish Year: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 759

This Paper With 7 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

IRANWEB01_039

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 29 شهریور 1394

Abstract:

Because of a variety of procedures related to design and presentation of web content and structure, there would be a pressing need to consider issues of quality of web information in upcoming years. It is argued, in the current paper, that evaluation issues related to credibility and quality assessments are of high importance in web environment in comparison with traditional information environments. Some evaluation skills like authority, coverage, currency, objectivity, accuracy, critical thinking and information literacy all of which could be categorized as Web Literacy would be fruitful in doing so. There exists, however, lack of evaluation skills among users caused by their cognitive styles, prior knowledge, information skills and of web resources characteristics as well. Some other solutions like dialectical reading, information ethics and also institutional policymaking will also be taken into account at the end of the paper.

Authors

Hamid Keshavarz

PhD candidate Faculty of Knowledge and Information Sciences, University of Tehran Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Rieh, S.Y and Danielson, D. 2007. "Credibility:A multidi sciplinary framework". ...
  • Doyle, T , and John L. Hammond, 2006 "Net cred: ...
  • source", Reference Services Review, Vol. 34(1), pp: 56 - 70. ...
  • Fritch, J. W., and Cromwell, R. L. 2002. "Delving deeper ...
  • Andrew J. Flanagin. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur ...
  • Ahtikari. J. and Erone. S. 2004. On a Journay Towards ...
  • httpss : /[ki elikompassi _ i yu. fi/re surs _ ...
  • Fallis, D. 2004. On verifying the accuracy of information: philosophical ...
  • Tate, M.A. 2009. Web wisdor How to evaluate ...
  • Tudjman, M. & Mikelic, N. 2003. Information Information, ...
  • http :/proceedin _ _ informin gscience .org/IS2003P roceedi gs/d5c s/204Tudj ...
  • Kapoun, J. 1998. Teaching undergrads WEB evaluation: A guide for ...
  • http ://www. ala. org/al a/acrl/acrlpub s/crlnews/back issues 1 9 9 ...
  • Scholz-Crane, A. 1998. Evaluating the future: A preliminary study of ...
  • Brandt, D.S. 1996. Evaluating information on the Intermet. Computers in ...
  • Scheeder, D. 2005, Information Quality of ...
  • http://www. ifla.org/IV/ifla7 1/papers/192e- Scheeder.pdf (accessed 16 August 2014). ...
  • Zhu, Y & Buchmann, A. 2003. Evaluating and Selecting Web ...
  • pub l i cation s/pdf/wise02 -zb .pdf (accessed 16 August ...
  • Beck, S. E. 1997. The Good, The Bad and The ...
  • http://] i b .n msu _ edu/i _ structi on/eval ...
  • Mortan-Martin, J. & Anderson, C. D. 2000. Oiline: ...
  • Re commendation s for Facilitating Accurate Mental Health Information Retrieval ...
  • Liu, Z. 2004. Perceptions of credibility of scholarly information on ...
  • Warnick, B. 2004. Online etho, Source credibility in an authorless ...
  • Flanagin, Andrew J., & Miriam Metzger. 2008. Digital Media and ...
  • Errami, M., and H. Garner. 2008. "A tale of two ...
  • Rieh, S. & Hilligoss, B. 2008. College Students" the ...
  • Hong, T. 2006. The influence of structural and message features ...
  • Rothkopf, D.J. 1999, The Disinformation age, Foreign Policy 114:82-96. ...
  • Abeles, P. and Morton, J. 1999. Avoiding Misinformation : reinstating ...
  • Capurro, R. 2003. Foundations of Information Perspectives. ...
  • http ://www. capuro .de/tampere9 1.htm(accessed 16 August 2014). ...
  • Wang, H. & Lu, X. 2007. Cyberdating: Misinformation and (Dis)trust ...
  • http : /inform. nu/Artic les/Vol 10/ISJv1 0p001- _ (accessed 13 ...
  • Calvert, P.J. 2001. Scholarly misconduct and M i sinformation on ...
  • Eysenbach, Gunther. 2008. Credibility of Health Information and Digital Media: ...
  • Clewley, N., Chen, S. Y. & Liu, X. 2009. Evaluation ...
  • Gunter, B., Campbell, V., Touri, M. & Gibson, R. 2009. ...
  • Weingarten, Fred W. 2008 Credibility, Politics, and Public Policy. Digital ...
  • Smith, A. G. 1997. Testing the surf: criteria for evaluating ...
  • http:/info. lib _ uh _ edu/pr/v 8/n3/smit8n3 .html(acces sed 16 ...
  • Childs, S. 2005. Judging the quality of internet- Performance ...
  • Sorapure, M., Inglesby, P. & Yatchisin, G. 1998. Web Literacy: ...
  • Elmborg, J. 2006. Critical Information Literacy: Implications for Instructional Practice. ...
  • Mattus, M. 2007. Finding Credible Information: A Challenge to Students ...
  • Gilster, P. 1997. Digital literacy. New York: John Wiley & ...
  • Sundin, O. 2008. Negotiations on information- seeking expertise: A study ...
  • Kuiper, E., Volman, M. & Terwel, J. 2008. Students' use ...
  • http : /Information .net/ir/ 1 3-3/paper35 1.html. ...
  • Walton, M. & Archer, A. 2004. The Web and information ...
  • Kaufmann, W. 1977. The future of the humanities. New York: ...
  • Carbo, T & Smith, M. 2008. Global information ...
  • Pavlik, John V. 2012. Media Ethics in the Digital Age. ...
  • _ _ Foundation of Information Ethics, Ethics and Information Technology ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع