Typing of Fusobacterium necrophorum Strains Using Polymerase ChainReaction (PCR) Based Methods

Publish Year: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 358

متن کامل این Paper منتشر نشده است و فقط به صورت چکیده یا چکیده مبسوط در پایگاه موجود می باشد.
توضیح: معمولا کلیه مقالاتی که کمتر از ۵ صفحه باشند در پایگاه سیویلیکا اصل Paper (فول تکست) محسوب نمی شوند و فقط کاربران عضو بدون کسر اعتبار می توانند فایل آنها را دریافت نمایند.

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IEM-2-1_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 16 شهریور 1395

Abstract:

Background: Fusobacterium necrophorum as a non-spore-forming Gram-negative anaerobic bacillus is an important human and animalpathogen. It may cause severe systemic infections (Lemierre's syndrome) and some other infections. The aim of this study was to subtypeFusobacterium necrophorum by using PCR methods.Materials and Methods: Twenty five strains of Fusobacterium necrophorum subspecies funduliformis were used. Extraction of DNA andtyping of the strains using REP-PCR, ERIC-PCR and BOX-PCR were done.Results: Molecular typing of Fusobacterium necrophorum using REP1-R-I and REP-2-I primers generated 2 to 5 amplicons ranging in sizefrom 1500bp to 2000bp. GelCompar comparison of banding patterns revealed seven distinct ribotype strains from 25 strains tested of whichmost were 2 and 4 with 8 and 7 strains respectively. BOX-PCR subtyping generated 2 to 7 comparable amplicons ranging in size fromapproximately 600bp to more than 2000bp. ERIC-PCR subtyping generated 6 to 11 amplicons ranging in size from approximately 100bp to1500bp.Conclusion: F. necrophorum strains have genomic variations that suggest they are never truly clonal in nature, or they may have undergonelocalized genetic variation across worldwide. This study also showed subtypes existing in Fusobacterium necrophorum species. We havedemonstrated that Fusobacterium necrophorum REP-PCR types can be divided into seven, three subtypes by BOX-PCR and six subtypes byERIC-PCR. BOX-PCR typing proved to be the most discriminatory method, yielding two-seven major bands. The sample size was too smallto interpret statistically

Authors

Ahmad Rahmati

Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

Jon S. Brazier

Anaerobic Reference Laboratory, NPHS Microbiology, Cardiff University Hospital of Wales, UK