Religious Epistemology and Dialectic

Publish Year: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: Persian
View: 253

This Paper With 16 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_PFK-21-81_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 7 خرداد 1399

Abstract:

Hajj Muhammad Legenhausen* Received: 20/02/2019     |       Accepted: 15/04/2019 Much recent discussion of the epistemology of religious belief has focused on justification of belief in the existence of God. Religious belief, however, includes much more than belief in God. In this paper, it is argued that the justification of belief in God is best seen in the context of other interrelated religious beliefs and practices. Philosophers of religion argue about whether religious belief requires evidence and on the sorts of arguments that have been presented. In this paper, a dialectical approach to the justification of religious belief is suggested that draws upon Hegel, Peirce, and W. E. Hocking. Rational reflection on the nature of experience that provides the solution to the problems of skepticism and solipsism in the Hegelian tradition, a tradition self-consciously developed by both Peirce and Hocking. If reason itself is only manifest in social exchanges, then the rationality of religious belief cannot be a private affair restricted to the subject of experience; rather it is the process of communicative interactions in accord with the overlapping norms of those who participate in them. Finally, some implications of this approach for the problem of religious diversity are sketched.   * Professor of Philosophy, The Imam Khomeini Education and Research Institute, Qom, Iran     ׀    legenhausen@yahoo.com Legenhausen, M. (2019). Religious Epistemology and Dialectic. The Journal of Philosophical-Theological Research, 21(81), 43-58. doi: 10.22091/PFK.2019.4085.2065.

Authors

Hajj Muhammad Legenhausen

استاد فلسفه ، موسسه آموزش و تحقیقات امام خمینی ، قم ، ایران

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Alston, W. P. (1982). Religious Experience and Religious Belief. Noûs, ...
  • Alston, W. P. (1991). Perceiving God. Ithaca: Cornell. ...
  • Beiser, F. C. (Ed.). (1993). The Cambridge Companion to Hegel ...
  • Beiser. F. C. (2005). Hegel. New York: Routledge. ...
  • Blackstone. W. T. (1963). The Problem of Religious Knowledge. The ...
  • Calton, P. M. (2001). Hegel’s Metaphysics of God. Aldershot: Ashgate. ...
  • Craig. W. L. (1979). The Kalām Cosmological Argument. London: Macmillan. ...
  • Flew, A. & Macintyre, A. (1955). New Essays in Philosophical ...
  • Hick, J. (1957). Faith and knowledge: a modern introduction to ...
  • Hocking, W. E. (1959). Types of philosophy, (3rd edition). New ...
  • Hocking. W. E. (1912). The Meaning of God in Human ...
  • Kanzian, C., & Legenhausen, M. (Eds.). (2010). Soul: A Comparative ...
  • Lauer, Q. (1982). Hegel’s Concept of God. Albany: State University ...
  • Legenhausen. M. (2009). William E. Hocking on Religious Experience. in ...
  • Löffler, W. (2006). Einführung in die Religionsphilosophie. Darmstadt: WBG. ...
  • McTaggart, J. M. E. (1922). Studies in the Hegelian Dialectic. ...
  • Misbah Yazdi. M. T. (2010). Two Problems in the Theory ...
  • Mitchell, Basil. (1973). The Justification of Religious Belief. London: Macmillan. ...
  • Plantinga, A. (1967). God and Other Minds: A Study of ...
  • Plato. (1997). Plato: Complete Works (J. M. Cooper & D. ...
  • Rescher, N. (2006). Philosophical Dialectics: An Essay on Metaphilosophy. Albany: ...
  • Sanders, A. F. & de Ridder, K. (2007). Fifty Years ...
  • Smith, J. E. (1995). Experience and God. New York: Fordham ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع