Functionality of Ethically Approved Neuromodulation and Neurostimulation in PTSD Treatment with Mereotopological Models

Publish Year: 1397
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 477

نسخه کامل این Paper ارائه نشده است و در دسترس نمی باشد

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

NSMED01_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 5 آذر 1397

Abstract:

While reasons for studying DBS for PTSD are not very fairly ethically justified, there is a little bit more of that ethical ground for Superficial Brain Stimulation (SBS) when it comes to treating PTSD patients. The perception of optical nature can somehow be phenomenologically derived from electrophysiological persisting apperception. Knowledge generated from the trials that are related to Deep Brain Stimulation have sometimes been applied to those who have not been suffering from the treatment refractory PTSD as a result of taking part in combat and/or battle. This spells that those aspects of consciousness that are explored with the quality of the signals ups and downs within either deep or shallow brain stimulation, have their own differences not that robustly expressed. In the majority of cases we can go to the methodology that we ourselves have specifically created as for the approximate approximations of another type of the calculus than the ACCEPTED one. Those fields of excitation or inhibition that are not generally protruded into by the Kopf bifurcations of asymptotes which might be brought out as a result of the stability bijection calculus, have their own their excitation and inhibition trends within various strata of the hierarchy of a PTSD patient dreams. Those dreams that could not be exactly semiotic; that is to say: they may be translated into the co-events of life, or: they may be asemiotic—that is: not able to be exactly or maximally equivalent to battle events and/or domestic violence, possess potentiality of alterations in neuronal activities of central auditory pathways. Such neural routes that are not in disconnection from the optical diffraction of the hierarchical post-traumatic topology signals which we are talking about, show themselves very well unless and until hippocampus, amygdala, anterior insula, and anterior cingulate cortex are not full well acted out in graphs and poly-diagrams with their own specific quasi-asymptotes. We have, of course, come to the conclusion that dreaming and waking as differential phase states of consciousness may be defined through the compactified diagram activation of mereological ad hoc properties—such as characteristics involved with those topological asymptotes of which we talked when we combining the resultant calculus with differential topology. So we are here actually considering the mereotopological dramatic differences that are chemically determined either by the brain-based theory of consciousness or by those theories of consciousness which simply differentiate waking and sleeping hours according to apparent peaks and lows [ups and downs] of hyperassociation. We are categorising the dreams into hyper-associated, hypo-associated, and normally associated both whitin their own correlations and according to co-eventuality with true life happenings. These three categories correct the orientation in space-time. These make us able to not only find out what is happening deep inside the space body image of a person with some of the worst conditions of PTSD but also the transition phase state is that may be so described better, or more fully, as a transitionally timespace virtual vs actual indexing.

Authors

Roya Attarzadeh

Young Researches and Elite Club, Islamic Azad University, Behbahan Branch, Behbahan, Iran

Mohammad Reza Sanaye

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Fatemeh Amini

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran