The effects of expressive writing intervention for Patients with cancer; An overview of systematic reviews

Publish Year: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 408

متن کامل این Paper منتشر نشده است و فقط به صورت چکیده یا چکیده مبسوط در پایگاه موجود می باشد.
توضیح: معمولا کلیه مقالاتی که کمتر از ۵ صفحه باشند در پایگاه سیویلیکا اصل Paper (فول تکست) محسوب نمی شوند و فقط کاربران عضو بدون کسر اعتبار می توانند فایل آنها را دریافت نمایند.

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

این Paper در بخشهای موضوعی زیر دسته بندی شده است:

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

PSYCHOLOGY03_094

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 24 شهریور 1399

Abstract:

background and objectives; various individual and systematic reviews investigating theeffects of expressive writing intervention led to different results due to using heterogenoussamples and methodology. This overview aimed to evaluate the systematic reviews of effectof expressive writing intervention for improving health outcomes.search metod;searches wereconducted in google scholar, google, yahoo, and Cochrane databases of systematic reviewsfrom 1986 to October 2019.Findings; From citations we found 3 systematic reviews that met our inclusion criteria.Zachariae and oToole found only a significant moderating effect of social constraintssuggesting that participants experiencing low levels of emotional support may be likely tobenefit from EWI and oh and Kim in terms of physical outcomes found a significant smalleffect (0.26 on relieving cancer symtoms in subgroup analysis. But kupeli et al showed noclear difference in the effect of expressive writing on sleep, anxiety or deression. Also, theyshowed that studies had methodological shortcoming and evidence was generally of lowquality. Investigating the methodological quality of included systematic reviews in thisoverview using AMSTAR tool showed a moderate quality for all of them.Conclusion; Clinically Significant heterogeneity between original studies and systematicreviews especially in terms of methodology, samples, setting, outcomes, follow upassessment, mode of intervention, dosage variables and confounding variables may explainvarious results. Future rigorous individual studies and systematic reviews must be conductedto show it main effect.

Authors

Parv Dorra

Department of Clinical Psychology , Iranshahr University of Medical sciences , Iranshahr , Iran