Educational management and Classification of Schools

Publish Year: 1389
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 1,743

This Paper With 13 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

MIEAC01_848

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 10 دی 1389

Abstract:

quality assurance and standards department is one of the five departments in the Ministry of Higher Education, Science & Technology mandated to ensure that Education Standards are adhered to. One of the factors that is considered in defining the quality of education is the school quality (Eshiwani, 1993) (1) which is dictated by the category of the school (national, provincial, district and private. Once a learner joins a school, the school characteristics may influence his or her achievement. The quality of instructional process experienced by each learner determines the school quality. Factors associated with the instructional processes are material inputs such as textbooks, quality of teachers, teaching practices and classroom organization, school management and structure.A problem however arises when schools are categorized into national, provincial, district and private schools. These categorization renders the schools so unique from one another such that applying the same standards assurance may not be fair. Categorization has made the schools to have students with different entry behavior different sources of funding, different teachers' characteristics and different physical facilities to mention but a few. The schools with good political good will where teachers are highly motivated are likely to perform better than those for who motivation is unheard of & especially where there're political wrangles on a daily basis. Political goodwill also enables schools to access Constituency Development Funds to enable them improve their facilities and pay fees for the needy students. This makes students in schools with political patronage concentrate in their studies while those from schools with no political patronage are perpetually sent home for fees. This affects performance in the final analysis. This paper examines how categorizations of schools affect assessment of quality assurance due to seeming disparity among schools. Finding (The Standard April,1 0,201 0)2 indicate that. what we have are high cost secondary public secondary schools and low cost village schools heads association further noted that some regions send more students to universities than others. For instance Alliance high school alone there were 104 candidates who scored grade A while the whole of North Eastern province did not have a single student scoring an A. Furthermore national schools have libraries for every department while district schools are still grappling with inadequate classrooms and staff shortage. A look at fees structures of most national schools show they charge about Ksh. 70,000 per year. That amount's way above the Ministry of Education guideline of Ksh. 18,627, for public boarding secondary schools. This's absurd given that the public mixed day schools charge Ksh 5,300 as per the Ministry guidelines. It further examines how these categorization dictates access to both physical facilities and the human resource and characteristics of students admitted to join these schools. The findings indicate that categorization of schools and hence students have rendered the work of the quality assurance officers irrelevant. This is because each category of school is unique with unique problems, given the regional disparities. Assessing students whose future performance is already predetermined by the type of schools they attend and their entry behavior not to mention the characteristics of their teachers is absurd. National schools and especially those in urban centers have the best facilities including the best teachers, some of who set and examine at the national level. These category of teachers tend to teach examination oriented materials in order to appear in the top list of achievers when examination results are released. Students attitudes towards education, themselves( self concept) teachers and their schools in general differ from school to school. This difference is reflected in their performance in national examinations. Those who perform above average are generally inclined to have more positive attitude and therefore perform well. Schools are different and it's this difference in terms of discipline, student selection ,teachers confidence in leadership of the school which has a bearing on how students perform in national examinations. The study recommends that standardized quality assurance regulations be discarded and specific standards for each school be applied for maximum improvement of academic performance since schools are not homogenous and neither are learners to be subjected to general rules indiscriminately given the glaring National disparities in secondary schools.

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Commissioner for Higher _ Re -Engineering University Education for National ...
  • Republic of Kenya (1964)- Kenya Education Commis sion Report (Ominde ...
  • Cash, C. W. (1993) - A study of the rekationship ...
  • Mwiria , Kilemi - The Standard on Saturday 13/201). ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع