Evaluation of Metal Artifacts in Cone Beam Computed Tomography by Metal Supported Porcelain Crowns Using Different FOV and Localizations: An In Vitro Study

Publish Year: 1399
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 147

This Paper With 7 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JDMT-9-2_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 19 دی 1399

Abstract:

Introduction: Metal-supported porcelain crowns (MSPC) and bridge restorations may be present in the mouths of patients undergoing CBCT imaging. Artifacts that are caused by these MSPCs may adversely affect image quality. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of different FOV (field of view) and localization in FOV on metal artifacts caused by MSPC. Methods: Twenty MSPCs scanned with CBCT at central and peripheral localization at 18x16 and 8x8 cm FOV. The 2.5 mm periphery area of the MSPC cross-sectional image was evaluated. The metal artefact-area within this area was measured. Then, the artifact-area to total-area ratio was converted to form of a percentage. In addition to evaluation of crown periphery area, the lengths of the metal streaks artifacts were measured. The maximum linear dimension of the metal artifact was recorded from the crown margin for each MSPC in cross-sectional image in the bucco-lingual direction. All data collected were evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis analysis and Mann Whitney U test (P˂0,05). Results: No statistically significant differences were found in the artifacts-area measured (P=0.121). However, there was a statistically significant difference in linear dimension measurements of artifacts (P=0.000). In 18x16 cm FOV localization peripheral linear dimension measurements were higher than other FOV and localizations. Conclusion: Linear size artifacts of MSPC were found to be higher in peripheral positioning in wide FOV. However, according to this study, areas evaluated for metal artifacts caused by MSPCs are not affected by FOV and localization.

Authors

Numan Dedeoğlu

İnonu University, Dentistry Faculty, Depertment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology

Yasin Yaşa

Ordu University, Dentistry Faculty, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • 1. Yildizer Keris E, Demirel O, Ozdede M, Altunkaynak B, ...
  • 2. Dedeoğlu N, Altun O, Bilge O, Sümbüllü MA. Evaluation ...
  • 3. Hassan B, Jacobs R. Cone beam computed tomography – ...
  • 4. Sanders MA, Hoyjberg C, Chu CB, Leggitt VL, Kim ...
  • 5. Barrett JF, Keat N. Artifacts in CT: recognition and ...
  • 6. Bechara BB, Moore WS, McMahan CA, Noujeim M. Metal ...
  • 7. Goldman LW. Principles of CT: radiation dose and image ...
  • 8. Nackaerts O, Maes F, Yan H, Couto Souza P, ...
  • 9. Queiroz PM, Santaella GM, da Paz TD, Freitas DQ. ...
  • 10. Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Okumura S, Naitoh M, Fujishita ...
  • 11. Queiroz PM, Groppo FC, Oliveira ML, Haiter-Neto F,  Freitas ...
  • 12. Neves FS, Freitas DQ, Campos PSF, Ekestubbe A, Lofthag-Hansen ...
  • 13. Pauwels R, Stamatakis H, Bosmans H, Bogaerts R, Jacobs ...
  • 14. Schulze, R, Heil U, Grob, D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow ...
  •  15. Taylor C. Evaluation of the effects of positioning and ...
  • 16. Ozaki Y, Watanabe H, Nomura Y, Honda E, Sumi ...
  • 17. Scarfe W, Farman A. What is cone-beam CT and ...
  • 18. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology– Principles and Interpretation. ...
  • 19. Nikbin A, Kajan ZD, Taramsari M, Khosravifard N. Effect ...
  • Imaging Sci Dent 2018; 48(4): 245-254. ...
  • 1. Yildizer Keris E, Demirel O, Ozdede M, Altunkaynak B, ...
  • 2. Dedeoğlu N, Altun O, Bilge O, Sümbüllü MA. Evaluation ...
  • 3. Hassan B, Jacobs R. Cone beam computed tomography – ...
  • 4. Sanders MA, Hoyjberg C, Chu CB, Leggitt VL, Kim ...
  • 5. Barrett JF, Keat N. Artifacts in CT: recognition and ...
  • 6. Bechara BB, Moore WS, McMahan CA, Noujeim M. Metal ...
  • 7. Goldman LW. Principles of CT: radiation dose and image ...
  • 8. Nackaerts O, Maes F, Yan H, Couto Souza P, ...
  • 9. Queiroz PM, Santaella GM, da Paz TD, Freitas DQ. ...
  • 10. Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Okumura S, Naitoh M, Fujishita ...
  • 11. Queiroz PM, Groppo FC, Oliveira ML, Haiter-Neto F,  Freitas ...
  • 12. Neves FS, Freitas DQ, Campos PSF, Ekestubbe A, Lofthag-Hansen ...
  • 13. Pauwels R, Stamatakis H, Bosmans H, Bogaerts R, Jacobs ...
  • 14. Schulze, R, Heil U, Grob, D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow ...
  •  15. Taylor C. Evaluation of the effects of positioning and ...
  • 16. Ozaki Y, Watanabe H, Nomura Y, Honda E, Sumi ...
  • 17. Scarfe W, Farman A. What is cone-beam CT and ...
  • 18. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology– Principles and Interpretation. ...
  • 19. Nikbin A, Kajan ZD, Taramsari M, Khosravifard N. Effect ...
  • Imaging Sci Dent 2018; 48(4): 245-254. ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع