Impact of Flattening Filter Free Photon Beam on Rapidarc Radiotherapy for Gynaecological Malignancies: A Comparative Study

Publish Year: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 194

This Paper With 7 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

این Paper در بخشهای موضوعی زیر دسته بندی شده است:

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJMP-18-1_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 19 دی 1399

Abstract:

Introduction: To compare the dosimetric outcomes of 6 and 10 MV flattening filter free beam (FFFB) energies in gynaecological malignancies RapidArc (RA) planning. Material and Methods: The RA plans were generated for a cohort of 20 patients using 6 and 10 MV FFFBs. The plans aimed to deliver a dose of 50.4Gy in 28 fractions to planning target volume (PTV); moreover, planning objectives were kept as low as reasonably achievable for organs at risk (OARs). Dosimetric analysis was performed in terms of PTV coverage, conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), dose to OAR’s, integral dose to normal tissue (NTID), and total number of monitor units (MU’s). Results: According to the results, volumes of PTV receiving prescription dose and CI values were 95.03±0.10% and 95.02±0.18%, as well as 1.018±0.028 and 1.024±0.027, respectively. Moreover, HI values were estimated at 1.063±0.008 and 1.068±0.010. Additionally, the corresponding values of mean NTID and MUs were 280.3±42.5 and 267.9±39.1 (liter-Gy), as well as 610.3±30.3 and 630.6±39.7 for FFFB using 6 and 10 MV, respectively. The 6 and 10 MV FFFBs were statistically similar in terms of mean dose to bladder, rectum and both femoral heads, while comparison yielded significant difference (p <0.05) in terms of HI, CI, MUs and NTID. Conclusion: The FFFB of 6MV was found superior, compared to 10MV, for RA planning in case of gynaecological malignancies. Moreover, it offers better HI and CI values, as well as fewer numbers of MUs (3.33%). In addition, it delivers more NTID (4.42%) for similar target coverage and OAR’s sparing.

Authors

Lalit Kumar

Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute &amp;amp; Research Center, New Delhi, India

Vimal Kishore

Department of Applied Science &amp; Humanities, Bundelkhand Institute of Engineering &amp; Technology, Jhansi, India

Manindra Bhushan

Medical Physics Division, Radiation Oncology Department, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute &amp;amp; Research Centre, Sector-۵, Rohini, Delhi-۱۱۰۰۸۵

Girigesh Yadav

Department of Medical Physics, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Research Center Delhi

Abhinav Dewan

Medical Physics Division &amp; Radiation Oncology Department,Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center, New Delhi, India

Pawan Kumar

Medical Physics Division &amp; Radiation Oncology Department, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center, New Delhi,India

Gourav Kumar

Medical Physics Division &amp; Radiation Oncology Department, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center, New Delhi,India

Rahul Chowdhary

Medical Physics Division &amp; Radiation Oncology Department, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center, New Delhi,India

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Swaminathan S, KatochVM.Consolidated report of hospital based cancer registries 2001-3, ...
  • Uma Devi K. Current status of gynecological cancer care in ...
  • Sunil Dutt Sharma. Unflattened photon beams from the standard flattening ...
  • Vassiliev ON, Titt U, Ponisch F, Kry SF, Mohan R, ...
  • Cashmore J. The characterization of unflattened photon beams from a ...
  • Kry SF, Vassiliev ON, Mohan R. Out-of-field photon dose following ...
  • medical accelerator. Phys Med Biol. 2010; 55: 2155–66. ...
  • Georg D, Knoos T, McClean B. Current status and future ...
  • Ponisch F, Titt U, Vassiliev ON, Kry SF, Mohan R. ...
  • Vassiliev ON, Titt U, Kry SF, Mohan R, Gillin MT. ...
  • Vassiliev ON, Titt U, Kry SF, Ponisch F, Gillin MT, ...
  • Spruijt KH, Dahele M, Cuijpers JP, Jeulink M, Rietveld D, ...
  • Hrbacek J, Lang S, Graydon SN, Klock S, Riesterer O. ...
  • Vasssiliev ON, KrySF,Kuban DA, Salehpour M, Mohan R, Titt U. ...
  • Nicolini G, Ghosh-Laskar S, Shrivastava SK, Banerjee S, Chaudhary S, ...
  • Zwahlen DR, Lang S, Hrbacek J, Glanzmann C, Kloeck S, ...
  • Yadav G, Bhushan M, Dewan A, Saxena U, Kumar L, ...
  • Kumar L, Yadav G, Kishore V, Bhushan M, Gairola M, ...
  • Kumar L, Yadav G, Raman K, Bhushan M, Pal M. ...
  • Kumar L, Yadav G, Samuvel KR, Bhushan M, Kumar P, ...
  • Lang S, Reggiori G, PuxeuVaquee J, Calle C, Hrbacek J, ...
  • Gasic D, Ohlhues L, Brodin NP, Fog LS, Pommer T, ...
  • Vassiliev ON, Kry SF, Kuban DA, Salehpour M, Mohan R, ...
  • Cashmore J, Ramtohul M, Ford D. Lowering whole-body doses in ...
  • Kragl G, Baier F, Lutz S, Albrich D, Dalaryd M, ...
  • Gurjar OP, Jha VK, Sharma SD. Radiation dose to radiotherapy ...
  • Akkurt I, Adler JO, Annand JR, Fasolo F, Hansen K, ...
  • Kry SF, Titt U, Ponisch F, Vassiliev ON, Salehpour M, ...
  • Mesbahi A. A Monte Carlo study on neutron and electron ...
  • NCRP. NCRP Report No. 79: Neutron Contamination for Medical Electron ...
  • Haas JA, Witten MR, Clancey O, Episcopia K, Accordino D, ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع