The Proximal Femoral Bone Geometry in Plain Radiographs

Publish Year: 1399
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 193

This Paper With 7 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_TABO-8-6_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 20 دی 1399

Abstract:

Background: Osteoporosis represents the most common bone disease and has to be respected in planning total hip replacement, especially against the background of increasing uncemented total hip replacement. In this context, theradiographic geometry of the proximal femur got into focus and is controversially discussed.The aim of the presented study was to find any difference regarding known indices for proximal femur bone geometrybetween patients with high-grade osteoarthritis and patients suffering from a femoral neck fracture caused by lowimpact trauma.Methods: Retrospective matched-paired analysis of 100 plane pelvic radiographs from 50 patients who suffered fromhigh-grade hip osteoarthritis and 50 patients who suffered from femoral neck fracture was performed. Measurement ofCanal-Bone Ratio (CBR), Canal-Calcar Ratio (CCR), Mineral Cortical Index (MCI) and Canal Flare Index (CFI) wereperformed.Results: CBR was significantly higher in the fracture-group (0.45 +/- 0.06 vs. 0.41 +/- 0.08) (P-value= 0.008). Moreover,the femoral thickness 10 cm below the trochanter minor [F] was significantly higher in the osteoarthritis-group (34.68+/- 4.14 vs 32.11 +/- 3.43) (P-value 0.001).Conclusion: In conclusion, patients with a femoral neck fracture demonstrated a higher CBR, which indicates a poorerbone quality. In case of planning a THA, the CBR is an index which can easily be measured and can be seen as onedecision criterion in THA regarding fixation technique.Level of evidence: III

Authors

David Grevenstein

University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, Department for Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Joseph-Stelzmann Strasse ۲۴, ۵۰۹۳۱ Cologne, Germany- Cologne Center for Musculoskeletal Biomechanics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, C

Boris Vidovic

University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, Department for Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Joseph-Stelzmann Strasse ۲۴, ۵۰۹۳۱ Cologne, Germany

Christoph Baltin

University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, Department for Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Joseph-Stelzmann Strasse ۲۴, ۵۰۹۳۱ Cologne, Germany- Cologne Center for Musculoskeletal Biomechanics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, C

Peer Eysel

University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, Department for Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Joseph-Stelzmann Strasse ۲۴, ۵۰۹۳۱ Cologne, Germany- Cologne Center for Musculoskeletal Biomechanics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, C

Christian Karl Spies

Vulpius Klinik, Department for hand surgery, Vulpiusstraße ۲۹, ۷۴۹۰۶ Bad Rappenau, Germany

Frank Unglaub

Vulpius Klinik, Department for hand surgery, Vulpiusstraße ۲۹, ۷۴۹۰۶ Bad Rappenau, Germany - Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany

Johannes Oppermann

University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, Department for Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Joseph-Stelzmann Strasse ۲۴, ۵۰۹۳۱ Cologne, Germany- Cologne Center for Musculoskeletal Biomechanics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, C