Determination of Predictive Power of CRIB-II and SNAPPE-II in Mortality Risk of Neonates with Low Gestational Age or Birth Weight Admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Publish Year: 1399
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 189

This Paper With 7 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IRJN-11-4_013

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 7 بهمن 1399

Abstract:

Background: Risk scoring systems evaluate neonatal outcomes using perinatal and neonatal status. The present study aimed to predict the mortality risk of preterm or low birth weight infants using the Clinical Risk Index for Babies (CRIB-II) and Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology Perinatal Extension (SNAPPE-II) scoring systems.Methods: This prospective cohort study investigated the preterm neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of Vali-e-Asr Hospital, Tehran, Iran, with the birth weight of ˂1500g or a gestational age˂32weeks using the CRIB-II and SNAPPE-II scoring systems within the first 12 h after birth. The area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the scoring systems, as well as the association between neonate factors and neonatal death were calculated in this study.Results: Out of 344 neonates under study, 253casessurvived after24hof birth and 91 newborns died. The total CRIB-II scores in survived and deceased infants were 6.12 and 10.28, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with a cut-off point of 8.5 was obtained at 0.838. Moreover, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were estimated at 74.4%, 78.65%, 55.37%, and 89.68%, respectively, for the CRIB-II system. Total scores of SNAPPE-II in survived and deceased infants were 16.9 and 51.6, respectively. The area under the ROC curve with a cut-off point of 27.5 was determined at 0.887. Sensitivity (84.44%) and specificity (79.05%) were calculated for the SNAPPE-II. Furthermore, positive and negative predictive values were 58.91% and 93.46%, respectively.Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the CRIB-II and SNAPPE-II scoring systems can be useful mortality predictors for at-risk neonates.

Keywords:

Authors

Hossein Dalili

Institute of Family Health, Breastfeeding Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Nahid Farrokhzad

Institute of Family Health, Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Health Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Zeinab Kavyani

Institute of Family Health, Breastfeeding Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Leyla Sahebi

Institute of Family Health, Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Health Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abbas Habibelahi

Neonatal Health Office, Ministry of Health, Management and Education of Iran, Tehran, Iran

Mina Ashrafzadeh

Institute of Family Health, Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Health Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Firuzeh Faridpur

Institute of Family Health, Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Health Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Mamak Shariat

Institute of Family Health, Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Health Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • 1. Angelidou A, Bell K, Gupta M, Leeman KT, Hansen ...
  • 2. Verklan MT, Walden M, Forest S. Core curriculum for ...
  • 3. Ghaffari Saravi V, Khani S, Kosarian M. Predictive value ...
  • 4. Jafrasteh A, Baharvand P, Karami F. Clinical risk index ...
  • 5. Asker HS, Satar M, Yildizdas HY, Mutlu B, Özyurt ...
  • 6. Fouladinejad M, Behnampour N, Zanjani A, Gharib MH, Kamrani ...
  • 7. Kadivar M, Sagheb S, Bavafa F, Moghadam L, Eshrati ...
  • 8. Patrick SW, Schumacher RE, Davis MM. Methods of  ...
  • mortality risk adjustment in the NICU: a 20-year review. Pediatrics. ...
  • 9. Richardson DK, Corcoran JD, Escobar GJ, Lee SK. SNAP-II ...
  • 10. Parry G, Tucker J, Tarnow-Mordi W; UK Neonatal Staffing ...
  • 11. Tucker J; UK Neonatal Staffing Study Group.Patient volume, staffing, ...
  • 12. Babaei H, Alipour A, Moradifaradinbeh L, Rezaei M. Assessment ...
  • 13. Snoek KG, Capolupo I, Morini F, van Rosmalen J, ...
  • 14. Nakwan N, Wannaro J, Chaiwiriyawong P. Is the SNAP-II ...
  • 15. Babaei H, Jafrasteh A. The evaluation of CRIB II ...
  • 16. Gandek B, Ware JE Jr. Methods for validating and ...
  • 17. Aaronson N, Acquadro C, Alonso J, Apolone G, Bucquet ...
  • 1992;1(5):349-51. ...
  • 18. Richardson DK, Gray JE, McCormick MC, Workman K, Goldmann ...
  • 19. Bezerra CT, Vaz Cunha LC, Libório AB. Defining reduced ...
  • 20. Thimoty J, Hilmanto D, Yuniati T. Score for neonatal ...
  • 21. Mohkam M, Afjeii A, Payandeh P, Zadkarami M, Kazemian ...
  • 22. Gagliardi L, Cavazza A, Brunelli A, Battaglioli M, Merazzi ...
  • 23. Khosravi N, Khosravi N. Evaluation of clinical risk factors ...
  • 24. Singh R. Abstract P-566: neonatal mortality risk assessment using ...
  • 25. Ezz-Eldin ZM, Hamid TA, Youssef MR, Nabil Hel-D. Clinical ...
  • 26. Sundaram V, Dutta S, Ahluwalia J, Narang A. Score ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع