The Comparative Study of English Translations in Al-Munafequn (The Hypocrites) Chapter of the Holly Quran from a Comprehensive Appraisal Theory Perspective

Publish Year: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 181

This Paper With 16 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_NRGS-8-1_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 12 بهمن 1399

Abstract:

This paper aimed to study four translations of the Holly Quran using a comprehensive Appraisal theory approach by Martin and White (۲۰۰۵). In so doing, the Chapter Al-Munafequn (The Hypocrites) was considered as the source text and four English translations of the Holly Quran (Arberry, ۱۹۵۵; Irving, ۱۹۸۵; Shakir, ۱۹۹۹; Yusuf Ali, ۱۹۳۴) were considered as the target texts. The study used a corpus-based qualitative translation assessment design. The data collection was based on purposive sampling, and the data analysis was based on all the three sub-systems of Appraisal theory (Attitude, Engagement, and Gradation) based on a three point assessment scale namely ‘+’ meaning acceptable, ‘-’ meaning unacceptable and ‘≈’ meaning relatively acceptable. The study comprised two research questions: (۱) What are the choices made by the four translations of the Al-Munafequn Chapter and how can the translations be evaluated individually? (۲) Which of the four translations is most qualified in terms of Appraisal theory sub-systems? To answer the first question, data were collected from each source independently and then evaluated and tabulated based on the appraisal theory. Regarding the second research question the following results were obtained: TT۱ (Arberry’s version) suggested acceptable translations in terms of the three aspects of Attitude, Engagement, and Gradation. TT۲ (Irving’s version) showed a fairly acceptable translation quality by fulfilling most of the Appraisal features of the original verse with several shortcomings. TT۳ (Shakir’s version) represented an acceptable translation as it dealt with many aspects of Appraisal in ST. Finally, TT۴ (Yusuf Ali’s version) showed a highly acceptable transfer of Appraisals in its translation. As a result, from among the four translations, TT۴ (Yusuf Ali’s translation) could be deemed as the most accurate version in translating the Appraisal sub-systems.

Keywords:

The Holly Quran Appraisal theory translation quality assessment attitude engagement gradation

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Arberry, J. A. (1955). The Koran interpreted. Oxford: Oxford University ...
  • Baker, M. (2011). In other words (2nded.). London and New ...
  • Brown, J. D. (1988). Understanding research in second language learning ...
  • García, L. J., León, L. E., & Munive, S. M. ...
  • Hadidi, Y., & Mohammadbagheri-Parvin, L. (2015). Systemic functional linguistics as ...
  • Hatim, B., & Munday, J. (2004).Translation: An advanced course book. ...
  • House, J. (2009). Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  ...
  • Irving, T. B. (1985). The Quran: The first American version. ...
  • Ledema, R., Feez, S., & White, P. R. R. (1994). ...
  • Mansour, S. (2010). Appraisal emotional adjectives in English/Arabic translation: A ...
  • Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005).Language of ...
  • Martin, J. R. (1997). Analyzing genre: Functional parameters. In F. ...
  • Munday, J. (2008). Introducing translation theories and applications (2nded.). London ...
  • Munday, J. (2012). Evaluation in Translation: Critical points of translator ...
  • Noori, F. (2014).A comparative study of the translation of emotional ...
  • Parra-Luna, F. (2001/02). An axiological systems theory: Some basic hypotheses ...
  • Parra-Luna, F. (2008). Axiological systems theory: A general model of ...
  • Read, J., Hope, D., & Carrol, J. (2007). Annotating expressions ...
  • Shakir, M. H. (1999). The Quran. New York: TahrikeTarsile Quran. ...
  • White, P. R. R. (2012-2015). Appraisal website. Retrieved Nov 17, ...
  • Williams, J., & Chesterman, A. (2002).The map: A beginner''''''''s guide ...
  • Williams, M. (2001).The application of argumentation theory to translation quality ...
  • Yusuf, A. A. (1934). The Holy Quran: translation and commentary: ...
  • Shahbazi, M., & Shahbazi, A. (2013). An Investigation of the ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع