Exploring Contents of Peer Feedback Dynamics Using Patterns of Pair Interaction: Iranian EFL Learners' Written Discourse in Focus

Publish Year: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 299

This Paper With 24 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_RELT-9-1_007

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 12 بهمن 1399

Abstract:

This study investigated the content of peer feedback dynamics using patterns of pair interaction among Iranian EFL learners in English writing class, making use of Audio Stimulated Recall (ASR) interview and the compositions. This qualitative case study was conducted comprising twelve EFL learners at Poldokhtar University. Three kinds of data, including semi-structured interviews, writing assignments, and the artifacts of peer feedback dynamic using patterns of pair interaction, were analyzed by software NVivo 8.0. The findings revealed that the quality of writing was improved by peer feedback dynamics using patterns of pair interaction; the content of peer feedback dynamics became more detailed and various, and the content of peer feedback dynamics focuses on the six aspects including mechanics, syntax, error correction, pragmatic functions, word choice, and style.Specifically, students perceived the contents of the writing, reinforced their critical thinking ability, and enhanced their social interaction skills. Hence, peer feedback should be implemented in L2 writing. Some implications of the study were discussed.

Keywords:

Content of Peer Feedback , Iranian EFL learners , Patterns of Pair Interaction , Peer Feedback Dynamics , writing skill

Authors

Ahmadreza Jamshidipour

Department of English Language, Malayer Branch, Islamic Azad University, Malayer, Iran

Hamidreza Khalaji

Department of English Language, Malayer Branch, Islamic Azad University, Malayer, Iran

Faramarz Azizmalayeri

Department of English Language, Malayer Branch, Islamic Azad University, Malayer, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Allharbi, M. A. (2019). Patterns of EFL learners’ and instructor’s ...
  • Amrhein, H. R., & Nassaji, H. (2010). Written corrective feedback: ...
  • Austria, M. A. B. (2017). Peer Response as an Effective ...
  • Bazeley. A.  (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. London: Sage. ...
  • Biber, D., Nekrasova, T., & Horn, B. (2011). The effectiveness ...
  • Bijami, M. (2013). Peer feedback in learning English writing: Advantages ...
  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research ...
  • Brown, G., & Yule. G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge ...
  • Brusa, M., & Harutyunyan, L. (2019). Peer review: A tool ...
  • Chang, Y. H. (2016). Two decades of research in L2 ...
  • Chen J. P. (2005). Language characters and their translation in ...
  • Chomsky, N. (2002). Syntactic Structure. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin & ...
  • Chong, I. (2017). Reconsidering teacher, peer, and computer-generated feedback. Current ...
  • Cohen, L.  (2007). Research methods in education (7th ed.). London: ...
  • Cox, C. D., Peeters, M. J., Stanford, B. L., & ...
  • Dignen, B. (2014). Five reasons why feedback may be the ...
  • Enginarlar, H. (1993). Student response to teacher feedback in EFL ...
  • Ferris, D. R., Brown, J., Liu, H., & Stine, M. ...
  • Ferris, D., Eckstein, G., & DeHond, G. (2017). Self-directed language ...
  • Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: implications for ...
  • Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process ...
  • Foster, P. (2007). Working with critical feedback to improve research ...
  • Gnadimathi, A., & Zarei, N. (2018). The impact of critical ...
  • Gielen, M., & De Waver, B. (2015). Structuring peer assessment: ...
  • Graham, S. (2010). Teaching writing. In P. Hogan (Ed.), Cambridge ...
  • Hansen, J. G. & Liu, J. (2005). Guiding principles for ...
  • Hirose, K. (2008). Cooperative learning in English writing instruction through ...
  • Hu, G. & Lam. S. T. E.  (2010). Issues of ...
  • Hu, G. (2005). Using peer review with Chinese ESL student ...
  • Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language ...
  • Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. New York: Cambridge University ...
  • Junqueira, L., & Payant, C. (2015). “I just want to ...
  • Kamimura, T. (2006). Effects of peer feedback on EFL student ...
  • Khalil, E. (2018). The efficacy of peer feedback in Turkish ...
  • Kunwongse, S. (2013). Peer Feedback, Benefits, and Drawbacks. Thammasat Review, ...
  • Lam, R. (2010). A peer review training workshop: Coaching students ...
  • Liu, J. & Hansen. J. (2002). Peer response in second ...
  • Liu, Q, & Wu, S. (2019). Same goal, varying beliefs: ...
  • Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better ...
  • Memari Hanjani, A. (2016). Collaborative revision in L2 writing: learners‟ ...
  • Memari Hanjani, A. & Li, L. (2014a). Exploring L2 writers' ...
  • Memari Hanjani, A. & Li, L. (2014b). EFL learners‟ written ...
  • Min, H. T. (2016). Effect of teacher modeling and feedback ...
  • Min, H.T.  (2005). Training students to become successful peer reviewers. ...
  • Oliver, R. (2002). The patterns of negotiation for meaning in ...
  • Pinter, A. (2005). Task repetition with 10-year-old children. In C. ...
  • Pinter, A. (2007). Benefits of peer-peer interaction: 10-year-old children practicing ...
  • Rafiei, M., & Salihi, N. (2016). Iranian English Teachers’ Perception ...
  • Rashidi, N. & Rafieerad, M. (2010). Analyzing Patterns of Classroom ...
  • Rao, S.P. (2019). The teaching of writing skills to foreign ...
  • Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing ...
  • Ruegg, R. (2017). Learner revision practices and perceptions of peer ...
  • Ruggiero, V. R. (2012). The art of thinking: A guide ...
  • Saito, H. (1994). Teachers’ practice and students’ preferences for feedback ...
  • Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing ...
  • Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. ...
  • Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. ...
  • Truscott, J. (2004). Evidence and conjecture on the effects of ...
  • Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ...
  • Tsui, A. B. M. & Ng, M. (2000). “Do secondary ...
  • Yang, L. G. (2014). Business English writing course (2nd ed.). ...
  • Yong, M. F. (2010). Collaborative writing features. RELC Journal, 41(1), ...
  • Zamel, V. (1982). Writing: The process of discovering meaning. TESOL ...
  • Zhang, Z. C. (2007). Towards an integrated approach to teaching ...
  • Zhu, W. (2001). Interaction and feedback in mixed peer response ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع