Seismic evaluation of nonlinear dynamic response of dual resisting systems (MRF and EBF

Publish Year: 1390
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 1,436

This Paper With 8 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

SEE06_043

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 16 اردیبهشت 1390

Abstract:

Use of steel structural dual systems such as Moment Bending Frame and Eccentrically Braced Frames MRF-EBF, within the last decade, has been widely progressed and used in engineering building industry especially in high-rise buildings. The Interaction between the two systemsmakes the dual system to have a complicated seismic performance behavior. Therefore, linear static methods mainly used in current design seismic codes might not be reliably able to consider such effects precisely. However, dynamic analysis methods by which the above mentioned point is physically better taking into account end with more reliable response particularly in nonlinear seismic response history of the structures. MRF- EBF systems are one of the widely used dual resisting systems in moderate to tall buildings. In this study the interaction between these types of dual systems are investigated considering different collapse mechanisms. Finally different types of static nonlinear analysis currently used are performed and have been evaluated based on accuracy of estimations on deformation and internal forces in elements.

Authors

m Razi

Department of Civil Engineering , Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Amador Teran- Gilmore, Jorge Ruiz, Garcia, Comparative seismic performance of ...
  • ا [0.037 I 0 205 ا _ 0.198 I 277.ل ...
  • Di splacement-B ased approaches , Journal of Soil Dynamics and ...
  • L. Di Sarno, A.S. Elnashai , 'Bracing systems for seismic ...
  • Internationa Building Code (IBC 2006) ...
  • Vamvatsikos, D., and Cornell, C.A., 2002, 'Incremental dynamic analysis, submitted ...
  • Potuan Chen, Kevin R. Collins , Some observations O1 performance- ...
  • Vamvatsikos, D., and Cornell, C.A., 2002, "Incremental dynamic analysis, submitted ...
  • _ _ seismosoft. com/en/S eismoS truct.aspx ...
  • Computers & Structures, Inc., "SAP2000, Structural Analysis Program;, Berkeley, California. ...
  • PRES TANDARD AND C OM MENTARY FOR THE SEISMIC REHAB ...
  • Improvement Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures (FEMA 40), ...
  • Vamvatsikos, D., and Cornell, C.A., 2002, :Incremental dynamic analysis, submitted ...
  • Antonion S., Rovithakis A., Pinho R. [2002], TDevelopment and verification ...
  • Scott M.H., Fenves G.L. [2006] "Plastic hinge integration methods for ...
  • Ferracuti B., Pinho R., Savoia M., Francia R. [2009] 'Verification ...
  • Erol Kalkan, Sashi K. Kunnath , Assessment of current nonlinear ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع