Improving the Results of Fire and Explosion Risk Assessment Method Using Fuzzy Logic in a Gas Refinery

Publish Year: 1399
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 342

This Paper With 6 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

این Paper در بخشهای موضوعی زیر دسته بندی شده است:

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_AOH-4-3_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 2 اسفند 1399

Abstract:

Background: The occurrence of fire and explosion accidents in the process industries is accompanied by the gradual release of large amounts of energy. The DOW Index is one of the methods of evaluating fire and explosion in the process industries. The present study used the fuzzy logic method to improve the results of the fire and explosion risk analysis method and reduce their uncertainty (error in achieving the correct result). Methods: In the present cross-sectional study, having analyzed the gas separation process, the DOW index was applied to study high-risk equipment. Then, to optimize the behavior of the parameters affecting the DOW index, each weight parameter was assigned to between 0 and 1, and the membership functions of each degree of risk were determined based on the fuzzy rules classification system. The five selected linguistic variables based on membership functions were used to assess the risk level. Results: Considering butane, the level of fire and explosion risk was 231.3, which was less risky than the fuzzy logic result of 248.6. Methane risk was calculated according to the fire and explosion index of 262.1 while using fuzzy logic that was 265.6. The lowest risk difference was observed between the two methods for ethane (258.9 conventional method and 259.1 fuzzy method results). The risk level calculated by DOW for propane was 243.6, and the risk level was 255.1 while using fuzzy logic. Conclusion: Although both methods yielded a high degree of risk, fuzzy logic results indicated higher numerical values comparing to the conventional DOW method. Compared to the conventional DOW method, fuzzy logic results are closer to reality with higher confidence levels.  

Keywords:

Fire and explosion index , Risk assessment , DOW , Fuzzy logic , Process unit , شاخص حریق و انفجار , F& , EI , DOW , Fuzzy

Authors

Vahid Ahmadi Moshiran

MSC, Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Ali Karimi

Associate professor, Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Aysa Ghasemi Kuzeonan

MSC, Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Hamid Reza Jamshidi Slukloei

MSC, Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • 1. Nezamodini ZS, Rezvani Z, Kian K. Fire and explosion ...
  • 2. Ahmadi S, Adl J, Varmazyar S. Risk quantitative determination ...
  • 3. Dormohammadi A, Zarei E, Delkhosh MB, Gholami A. Risk ...
  • 4. AIChE C. Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis ...
  • 5. Khan FI, Abbasi SA, Software. Towards automation of HAZOP ...
  • 6. Soman AR, Sundararaj G. Consequence assessment of vapour cloud ...
  • 7. Gurjar BR, Sharma RK, Ghuge SP, Wate SR, Agrawal ...
  • 8. Zaranejad A, Ahmadi O. Fire and explosion risk assessment ...
  • 9. Marshall JT, Mundt A. Dow's chemical exposure index guide. ...
  • 10. Gupta JP, Khemani G, Mannan MS. Calculation of Fire ...
  • 11. Zarei M. " Isomax Unit of Tehran refinery Fire ...
  • 12. Jafari M, Zarei M, Movahhedi M. The credit of ...
  • 13. Cintula P, Fermüller C, Noguera C. Handbook of mathematical ...
  • 14. Jensen N, Jørgensen SB. Taking credit for loss control ...
  • 15. Suardin JA. The integration of Dow's Fire and explosion ...
  • 16. Suardin J, Mannan MS, El-Halwagi M. The integration of ...
  • 17. Mardani M, Lavasani SM, Omidvari M. An investigation into ...
  • 18. Pinto A, Nunes IL, Ribeiro RA. Qualitative model for ...
  • 19. Etowa CB, Amyotte PR, Pegg MJ, Khan FI. Quantification ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع