The impact of response format on validating grammaticality judgment tests

Publish Year: 1393
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 173

This Paper With 30 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_TELJ-8-1_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 اردیبهشت 1400

Abstract:

The present research aims to examine the influence of response format on the reliability and validity of grammaticality judgment tests. To this end, the grammaticality judgment test developed by Gass (۱۹۹۴) was selected as the instrument which was manipulated in terms of the response format while the original items remained intact. Thus, in the first phase of the study, a multiple-choice GJ test was constructed to be compared with the traditional form, i.e., the dichotomous type. The two tests were administered to a group of ۱۱۰ students. With regard to validity which was arrived at by means of internal correlations proposed by Alderson, Clapham and Wall (۱۹۹۵). In the second phase, GJ tests were developed in ordinal and likert scales to which ۴۹ students responded. The analysis unveiled the effect of response format on reliability. Concerning validity, which was examined via a post-test questionnaire, response format was selected as the second reason behind inconsistency in responses from participants’ view.

Authors

Mohammad Salehi

Sharif University of Technology,

Hemaseh Bagheri Sanjareh

Sharif University of Technology

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Alderson, J. C., Clapham, C., & Wall, D. (1995). Language ...
  • Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Razavieh, A. (1996). Introduction ...
  • Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: ...
  • Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing ...
  • Chapelle, C. (1988). Field independence: A source of language test ...
  • Cook, V. (2003). The innateness of a universal grammar principle ...
  • http://homepage.ntlworld.com/vivian.c/Writings/Papers/SD&UG.htm ...
  • Cook, V. J., & Newson, M. (1996). Chomsky’s universal grammar: ...
  • Currie, M., & Chiramanee, T. (2010). The effect of the ...
  • David, G. (2007). Investigating the performance of alternative types of ...
  • Davies, W. D., & Kaplan, T. I. (1998). Native speaker ...
  • Ellis, R. (1991). Grammaticality judgments and second language acquisition. Studies ...
  • Gass, S. M. (1994). The reliability of second-language grammaticality judgments. ...
  • Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: ...
  • Hatch, E., & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design ...
  • Henning, G. (1987). A guide to language testing. Cambridge, Mass: ...
  • Hsia, S. (1991). Grammaticality judgments, paraphrase and reading comprehension: Evidence ...
  • http://sunzi.lib.hku.hk/hkjo/article.jsp?book=10&issue=100004 ...
  • Kazuo, A. (2003). Development of multiple-choice grammaticality judgment tests. JLTA ...
  • Keenan, E. L., & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility ...
  • Keenan, E. L., & Comrie, B. (1979). Noun phrase accessibility ...
  • Kyzlinkova, L. (2007). On communicative language competence, validity and different ...
  • Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: ...
  • Mandell, P. B. (1999). On the reliability of grammaticality judgment ...
  • Masny, D., & D’Anglejan, A. (1985). Language, cognition, and second ...
  • Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to ...
  • Shohamy, E. (1984). Does the testing method make a difference? ...
  • Sorace, A. (1996). The use of acceptability judgments in second ...
  • Tremblay, A. (2005). Theoretical and methodological perspectives on the use ...
  • Tsagari, C. (1994). Method effect on testing reading comprehension: How ...
  • Weir, C. J. (2005). Language testing and validation: An evidence-based ...
  • White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge: ...
  • Yujie, J., & Wenxia, Z. (2007). Evaluating the construct validity ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع