Dynamic Assessment and Microgenetic Development of EFL Teachers’ Classroom Interactional Competence

Publish Year: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 160

This Paper With 36 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_TELJ-9-2_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 اردیبهشت 1400

Abstract:

Teachers’ capability in shaping learner contributions (SLC), as a part of Classroom Interactional Competence (CIC), has been evidenced to play a key role in opening up precious opportunities for learners’ involvement, and consequently learning. Yet, very few studies to date have explored how teacher education programs (TEPs) can develop teachers’ capability to SLC. To fill up this lacuna, a TEP, founded on the principles of dynamic assessment (DA), was implemented with four EFL teachers serving as participants. In so doing, initially twelve hours of video- and audio-recorded data of the teachers were analyzed to identify the samples in which they missed the opportunity for SLC. Then one-on-one DA sessions were held with each of the teachers, during which the teacher educator tried to assist them to develop a deepened insight into the strategies they adopted to shape their learners’ contributions. In such dialogic context, the feedback was calibrated to create and nurture the zone of proximal teacher development (ZPTD). After instructional sessions, conversation analysis of the teachers' regular classrooms indicated a rise in the total frequency and variety of the SLC strategies employed. Furthermore, it was found that teachers' type of development differed greatly from one another. Results are discussed and some pedagogical implications are presented.

Authors

Mahmood Moradian

Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran

Mola Miri

Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran

Zahra Qassemi

Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as ...
  • Beach, W.A., & T.R. Metzger. (1997). Claiming insufficient knowledge. Human ...
  • Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review ...
  • Calderhead, J. (1981). A psychological approach to research on teachers’ ...
  • Can Daşkın, N. (2014). Shaping learner contributions in an EFL ...
  • Davin, K. J. (2011). Group dynamic assessment in an early ...
  • Freeman, D., & Johnson, K. E. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base ...
  • Freeman, D., & Richards, J. C. (Eds) (1996). Teacher learning ...
  • Gutiérrez, A. G. (2007). Microgenesis, method and object: A study ...
  • Hutchby, I., & R. Wooffitt. (2008). Conversation Analysis. 2nd ed. ...
  • Johnson, K. E. (1999). Understanding language teaching: Reasoning in action. ...
  • Johnson, K. E. (2006). The sociocultural turn and its challenges ...
  • Johnson, K. E., & Golombek, P. R. (Eds). (2002). Teachers’ ...
  • Johnson, K. E., & Golombek, P. R. (2011). A sociocultural ...
  • Kurtoglu-Hooton, N. (2010). Post-observation feedback as an instigator of learning ...
  • Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Introducing sociocultural theory. In Lantolf, J. ...
  • Lantolf, J. P., & M.E. Poehner.  (2004).  Dynamic Assessment: Bringing ...
  • Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (Eds) (2008). Sociocultural ...
  • Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural Theory ...
  • Lee, Y. (2007). “Third Turn Position in Teacher Talk: Contingency ...
  • Lidz, C. S. (1991). Practitioner’s Guide to Dynamic Assessment. New ...
  • Lidz, C. S., & B. Gindis. (2003). Dynamic assessment of ...
  • Little, D. (2007). Knowledge about language and learner autonomy.  In ...
  • Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second Language Research: ...
  • Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for ...
  • Park, Y. (2013). The roles of third turn repeats in ...
  • Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskyian approach to ...
  • Poehner, M. E. (2009).  Group  dynamic assessment: Mediation  for the  ...
  • Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment ...
  • Schwab, G. (2011). “From Dialogue to Multilogue: A Different View ...
  • Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: ...
  • Tsui, A. B. M. (1997). Awareness raising about classroom interaction. ...
  • Van der Aalsvoort, G.M., & C.S. Lidz (2002). Reciprocity in ...
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of ...
  • Walsh, S. (2002). Construction or obstruction: teacher talk and learner ...
  • Walsh, S. (2003).  Developing  interactional  awareness in the second language ...
  • Walsh, S. (2006a). Investigating classroom discourse. Routledge. ...
  • Walsh, S. (2006b). Talking the talk of the TESOL classroom. ...
  • Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Taylor & ...
  • Walsh, S. (2012). Conceptualising classroom interactional competence. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on ...
  • Walsh, S., & L. Li. (2013). Conversations as Space for ...
  • Waring, H. Z. (2008). Using explicit positive assessment in the ...
  • Waring, H. Z. (2009). Moving  out of IRF (Initiation-Response-Feedback): A ...
  • Warford, M. K. (2011). The zone of proximal <i> teacher</i> ...
  • Yaqubi, B., & M. P. Rokni. (2012). Teachers’ limited wait-time ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع