Enhancing Discourse Markers Awareness among Iranian EFL Learners: A Product - Process Based View

Publish Year: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 163

This Paper With 26 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_TELJ-9-2_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 اردیبهشت 1400

Abstract:

While several researchers have studied discourse markers to determine their roles in language skills, still research needs to address these devices in relation to second language learners writing proficiency Hence, the present study had two main goals: identifying the usage of discourse markers used in Iranian writing compositions without instruction, and describing how treatment of discourse markers functions in learners’ writing.. Participants in this study were ۶۰ upper-intermediate and intermediate learners studying English as the second language at Safir, Qazvin branch. Descriptive composition writing was assigned to students to write on the topics, selected by the researchers and based on Fraser's (۱۹۹۰, ۱۹۹۹) taxonomy of discourse markers. The results indicate that within the explorative section, with the proficiency level rising, the frequency and the type of the discourse markers used subconsciously without the treatment rise. At the same time, the treatment and discourse marker awareness among the learners can be of significant value in both the quality and quantity of discourse markers. Of course, the type of the treatment must be adjusted to the proficiency level of the learners. This is in keeping with the previous research that reported a positive impact of instruction of DMs on success in language writing (Feng, ۲۰۱۰).

Keywords:

Discourse Markers , Product and Process-Based View , Writing

Authors

Mohammad Shabani

Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

Sana Goljani

Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Abdi, R. (2002). Interpersonal meta-discourse: An indicator of interaction and ...
  • AbdollahZadeh, E. (2006). The role of textual signals in L2 ...
  • Adel, A. (2006). Meta-discourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam: ...
  • Blakemore, D. (1987). Semantic constrains on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell. ...
  • Blackmore, D. (2001). Discourse and relevance theory. In The handbook ...
  • Blagojevic, S. (2003). Meta-discourse in academic prose: A contrastive study ...
  • Brinton, L. J. (1996). Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and ...
  • Bunton, D. (1999). The use of higher level meta-text in ...
  • Connor, U. (1984). A study of cohesion and coherence in ...
  • Dailey-O’Cain, J. (2000). The sociolinguistic distribution of and attitudes toward ...
  • Feng, L. (2010). Discourse Markers in English Writing. Journal of ...
  • Field, Y. & Yip, L. M. O.   (1992). A comparison ...
  • Fraser, B. (1990). An approach to discourse markers. Journal of ...
  • Grimes, J. E. (1975). The thread of discourse. New York: ...
  • Haliday, M.A.K. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. 3rd edition. ...
  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in ...
  • Hatim, B. (1997). Communication across cultures: Translation theory and contrastive ...
  • Hays, P.R., (1992). Discourse markers and L2 acquisition. Papers in ...
  • Hoey, M. (2001). Textual interaction: An introduction to written discourse ...
  • Karasi, M. (1994). Cohesive features in the expository essays of ...
  • Innajih, A. (2007). The effect of conjunctive types on the ...
  • Intarparawat, P. & Steffensen, M. S. (1995). The use of ...
  • Jalilifar, A. R. (2008). Discourse Markers in Composition Writings: The ...
  • Jalilifar, A. R., & Alipour, M. (2007). How explicit instruction ...
  • Johns, A. M. (1984). Textual cohesion and the Chinese speakers ...
  • Johnson, P. (1992). Cohesion and coherence in compositions in Mayland ...
  • Kroon, C. (1997). Discourse markers, discourse structure and functional grammar. ...
  • Lee, I. (1999). The acquisition of colloquial features by Korean ...
  • Lenk, U. (1998). Marking discourse coherence: Functions of discourse markers ...
  • Longo, B. (1994). Current research in technical communication: The role ...
  • Longrace, B. E. (1996). The grammar of discourse. London: Plenum ...
  • Longrcae, B. E. (1995). Left shifts in strongly VSO languages. ...
  • Matras, Y. (1997). The function and typology of coordinating conjunctions: ...
  • Mauranen, A. (1993). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Meta-text in Finnish-English economic ...
  • Moradan, A. (1995). Significance of conjunctions as a cohesive device ...
  • Morgan, Jerry L., and Sellner, M. B. (1980). Discourse and ...
  • Muller, S. (2004). Well you know that type of person: ...
  • Norment, N. (1994). Contrastive analyses of cohesive devices in Chinese ...
  • Nunan, D. (1991) Language Teaching Methodology. London: Prince Hall. ...
  • Osman, J. (1995). Pragmatic particles twenty years after. In Organization ...
  • Perez, M. A. & Macia, E. A. (2002). Meta-discourse in ...
  • Sarig, L. (1995). Discourse Markers in contemporary Arabic. Zeitschrift für ...
  •  Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ...
  • Schourup, L. (1999). Discourse markers: Tutorial overview. Lingua 107: 227-265. ...
  • Siepmann, D. (2005). Discourse markers across languages: A contrastive study ...
  • Steffensen, M. S. & Cheng, X. (1996). Meta-discourse and text ...
  • Traugott, E.C. (1995). Subjetification in grammaticalization. In D, Stein & ...
  • Trillo, J. R., (2002). The pragmatic fossilization of discourse markers ...
  • Ventola, E. & Mauranen, A. (1993). Non-native writing and native ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع