Corrective Feedback and Iranian EFL Learners' Spoken Complexity and Accuracy

Publish Year: 1397
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 235

This Paper With 27 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_TELJ-12-2_006

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 اردیبهشت 1400

Abstract:

One of the possible negative consequences of the corrective feedback (CF), as a way of focus on form, can be a trade-off between the learners' spoken complexity and accuracy, due to their attentional limitations. Consequently, the purpose of the current study was to investigate the effects of the different CF types on Iranian EFL learners' spoken complexity and accuracy and the trade-off between them. To this end, four preintermediate intact classes were randomly selected as the delayed explicit metalinguistic CF, intensive recast, extensive recast, and control groups. All groups' participants participated in spoken reproduction tasks for six sessions and their errors were treated differently. Then, the data were transcribed, coded for the complexity and accuracy, and statistically analyzed. The results indicated that different CF types had insignificant effects on the complexity of the spoken production. However, the delayed explicit metalinguistic CF group significantly increased the spoken specific accuracy. Considering the trade-off between the spoken complexity and accuracy, it was revealed that the correlations between them was statistically insignificant and different CF conditions had no significant effect on it. These findings suggest that CF, of the delayed explicit metalinguistic type, can be an effective way for the development of the spoken specific accuracy of the Iranian EFL learners. In addition, its development has no negative effects on their spoken complexity.

Authors

Farahman Farrokhi

University of Tabriz

Mohammad Zohrabi

University of Tabriz

Mohammad Hassan Chehr Azad

University of Tabriz

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Ahmadian, M. J. (2012).  The effects of guided careful online ...
  • Ahmadian, M. J., & Tavakoli, M. (2010). The effects of ...
  • Ammar, A., & Spade, N. ( 2006 ). One size ...
  • Ansarian, A. A. & Chehr Azad, M. H. (2015). Differential ...
  • Carroll, S. (2001). Input and evidence: The raw material of ...
  • Crookes, G.  (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second ...
  • Doughty, C. J. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. ...
  • Dougthy, C, J., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on ...
  • Dougthy, C. J., & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in ...
  • Ellis, N. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit ...
  • Ellis, R. (1991). Second language acquisition and language pedagogy. Clevedon: ...
  • Ellis, R. (1994). A theory of instructed second language acquisition. ...
  • Ellis, R. (2001). Investigating form-focused instruction.  Language Learning, 51(1), 1-46. ...
  • Ellis, R. (2003). Task based language learning and teaching. Oxford: ...
  • Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: ...
  • Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, ...
  • Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analyzing learner language. Oxford: ...
  • Ellis. R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and ...
  • Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). ...
  • Farrokhi, F., & Chehr Azad, M. H. (2012). The effects ...
  • Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning ...
  • Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken ...
  • Fotos, S., & Ellis, R. (1991). Communication about grammar: A ...
  • Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. M. (1994). Input, interaction, ...
  • Golshan, M. (2013). Corrective Feedback during Communicate Tasks: Do recasts, ...
  • Han, Z. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts ...
  • Harley, B., & Swain, M. (1984). The interlanguage of immersion ...
  • Hill, L. A. (1988). Steps to understanding. Oxford: Oxford University ...
  • Hoseini Fatemi, A., & Harati, N., A. (2014). The impact ...
  • Iwashita, N. (2003). Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based ...
  • Kamiya, N. (2015). The effectiveness of intensive and extensive recasts ...
  • Kawauchi, C. (2005). The effects of strategic planning on the ...
  • Krashen, S. (1982). Principals and practice in second language acquisition. ...
  • Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative ...
  • Li, S. (2010).The Effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A ...
  • Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus-on-form and corrective feedback ...
  • Loewen, S. (2011). Focus on form. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), ...
  • Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult ...
  • Long. M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature ...
  • Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment ...
  • Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to ...
  • Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: ...
  • Lyster, R. (2004).Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form- ...
  • Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and the ...
  • Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: ...
  • Maftoon, P., & Kolahi, S. (2009). The impact of recasts ...
  • Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as ...
  • Rahimi, A., & Vahid Dastjerdi, H. (2012). Impact of immediate ...
  • Rahimpour, M., Salimi, A., & Farrokhi, F. (2012). The effect ...
  • Rassaei, E. (2015). Oral corrective feedback, foreign language anxiety and ...
  • Rassaei, E., & Moinzadeh, A. (2014). Recasts, metalinguistic feedback, and ...
  • Robinson, P. (2003). Individual differences, cognitive abilities, aptitude complexes, and ...
  • Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective ...
  • Saeedi, P. (2015). Unguided strategic planning, task structure, and L2 ...
  • Salimi, A. (2015).The Effect of Focus on Form and Task ...
  • Sample, E., & Michel, M. (2014). An exploratory study into ...
  • Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2012). Peer interaction and corrective ...
  • Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language ...
  • Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial ...
  • Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and ...
  • Seyed Motahari, M., & Ghasemi Nik Manesh, A. (2014).The comparative ...
  • Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, ...
  • Sheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential effects ...
  • Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implication of task ...
  • Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, ...
  • Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, ...
  • Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task ...
  • Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and Tasks. In ...
  • Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A ...
  • Spada, N., & P. Lightbown (1993). Instruction and the development ...
  • Van Patten, B. (1990). Attending to form and content in ...
  • Vercellotti, M. L. (2012). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency as properties ...
  • Wigglesworth, G. (1997). An investigation of planning time and proficiency ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع