Elicitation, Recast, and Meta-Linguistic Feedback in Form-Focused Exchanges: Effects of Feedback Modality on Multimedia Grammar Instruction

Publish Year: 1392
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 230

This Paper With 27 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JTLS-31-4_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 اردیبهشت 1400

Abstract:

This research explores the effects of three computer-mediated feedback modalities, that is, elicitation, recast, and meta-linguistics, on the learning of English participial, gerund, and infinitival phrases among Iranian intermediate-level EFL learners. The overriding focus of the present study was to investigate whether different types of feedback given through form-focused computer-human exchanges would produce varying immediate and long-term effects on the participants’ incorporation of linguistic forms. To this end, ۱۶۰ participants were randomly assigned to three equivalent experimental groups. One group then received treatment on the three types of phrases through a tutorial system and multimedia grammar exercises where they received elicitation on the errors they made. The second and the third groups likewise received treatment on the same types of phrases through the same tutorial system, but received either recast or meta-linguistic feedback on their errors. The groups then sat for an immediate and a delayed post-test of grammar two weeks after the experiment. The experiment revealed that meta-linguistic feedback yielded the strongest immediate and sustained effects as compared with those of elicitation and recast. Likewise, while recast produced stronger immediate effects on learning as compared to those of elicitation, its sustained effects were much smaller than those of elicitation and meta-linguistic feedback.

Authors

Naser Rashidi

Associate Professor, TEFL Shiraz University

Hamed Babaie

Ph.D. Student, TEFL Shiraz University

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? ...
  • Babaie, H. (2008). On the effects of help options in ...
  • Babaie, H., & Khalili, M. (2010). Pictorial, textual, and picto-textual ...
  • Beatty, K. (2003). Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning. London: ...
  • Beaudoin, M. (2004). Educational use of databases in CALL. Computer ...
  • Brandl, K. K. (1995). Strong and weak students’ preferences for ...
  • Carroll, S. (2001). Input and evidence: The raw material of ...
  • Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: ...
  • Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English language learning and technology. Amsterdam: ...
  • Chapelle, C. A. (2005). Interactionist SLA theory in CALL research. ...
  • Collentine, J. (2000). Insights into the construction of grammatical knowledge ...
  • Cowan, R., Choi, H. E., & Kim, D. H. (2003). ...
  • DiGiovanni, E. & Nagaswami, G. (2001). Online peer review: an ...
  • DeKeyser, R. M. (2005). What makes learning second language grammar ...
  • Ellis, N. (2005). At the interface: dynamic interactions and explicit ...
  • Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, ...
  • Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and ...
  • Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language ...
  • Gass, S. M., & Torres, M. J. (2005). Attention when? ...
  • Glendinning, E., & Howard, R. (2003). Lotus ScreenCam as an ...
  • Greenfield, R. (2003). Collaborative e-mail exchange for teaching secondary ESL: ...
  • Heift, T. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in CALL. ...
  • Long, M. H. (1996) The role of linguistic environment in ...
  • Loewen, S. (2007). The prior and subsequent use of forms ...
  • Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Corrective feedback in the ...
  • Loewen, S., & Nabei, T. (2007). Measuring the effects of ...
  • Long, M. H. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence ...
  • Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: ...
  • Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in ...
  • McDonough, K. (2005). Identifying the impact of negative feedback and ...
  • Noonan, F. J. (2004). Teaching ESL students to "notice" grammar. ...
  • Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback ...
  • Petersen, K. A. (2010). Implicit corrective feedback in computer-guided interaction: ...
  • Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal ...
  • Sachs, R., & Suh, B., (2007). Textually enhanced recasts, learner ...
  • Sauro, S. (2009). Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of ...
  • Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA. Studies ...
  • Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language ...
  • Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.). Cognition and ...
  • Torlakovic, E., & Deugo, D. (2004). Application of a CALL ...
  • Van den Branden, K. (1997). Effects of negotiation on language ...
  • Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the ...
  • Zamel, V. (1981). Cybernetics: A model for feedback in the ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع