Focus on Lexis and L۲ Learners' Development of Oral Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency Measures

Publish Year: 1397
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 195

This Paper With 33 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JTLS-37-2_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 اردیبهشت 1400

Abstract:

Second language (L۲) theories have for long acknowledged the importance of focus on formulaicity or conventionalized lexical chunks. Yet, there has been little attempt to examine the impact of this on foreign language learners’ development of complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF) measures. The purpose of this study was twofold: First, to see whether lexis-based instruction had any significant effects on EFL learners' oral CAF, and, second, whether different types of lexis-based instructions (e.g., using corpus-based concordances, textual lexis enhancement, and audio-visual captioned lexis) had differential effects. Participants were ۵۴ EFL undergraduates at an Iranian university. After checking the initial homogeneity, ۲ groups of participants were randomly assigned to experimental (lexis) and control (non-lexis) groups. After pretesting on CAF, the lexis sub-groups received the ۳ types of lexis-based instructions in a counterbalanced manner. After each lexis instruction, students’ oral data were also obtained. The control group received mainstream non-lexis instruction. One-way MANCOVA results pointed to the significant effects of lexis instruction on oral CAF measures. Specifically, repeated-measures MANOVA results revealed that audio-visual captioned lexis was the most effective modality in heightening formulaicity. The findings suggest that focus on lexis is beneficial to L۲ learners’ oral skills. Further theoretical and pedagogical implications are discussed.

Authors

Azizullah Mirzaei

Shahrekord University

Ashraf Beyzaei

English Department, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran

Ali Roohani

English Department, Faculty of Letters & Humanities, ShahreKord University

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Alavi, S. T., & Sadeghi, K. (2017). Development of fluency, ...
  • Alexander, L. (1967). First things first. London: Longman ...
  • Ballester, C. P. (2012). CALL evaluation: Students' perception and use ...
  • Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H., & Demecheeler, ...
  • Chan, D., & Herrero, C. (2010). Using film to teach ...
  • Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2008). Formulaic sequences: Are they ...
  • DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ...
  • Dickinson, P. (2012). Improving second language academic presentations with formulaic ...
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford: ...
  • Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: ...
  • Fakhraee Faruji, L. & Ghaemi, F. (2017). Task complexity manipulation ...
  • Fang, J. (2013). The uses and functions of formulaic sequences ...
  • Foster, P. (2001). Rules and routines: a consideration of their ...
  • Graham, P. (2005). Task-based language teaching. Retrieved May 7, 2015, ...
  • Graham, L. (2009). It was a challenge but we did ...
  • Hameed, Q. J. (2002). The lexical approach between grammar and ...
  • Honan, E. (2008). Barriers to teachers using digital texts in ...
  • Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency ...
  • Hunston, S., & Francis, G. (1998). Verbs observed: a corpus-driven ...
  • Howarth, P. (1998). The phraseology of learners’ academic writing. In ...
  • Iwashita, N., Brown, A., McNamara, T., & O’Hagan, S. (2008). ...
  • Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. ...
  • Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2007). Task complexity and measures ...
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (1992). A nonhierarchical relationship between grammar and communication ...
  • Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach: The state of ELT ...
  • Lewis, M. (1997a). Implementing the lexical approach: Putting theory into ...
  • Lewis, M. (1997b).  Pedagogical implications of the lexical approach. In ...
  • Lewis, M. (2000). Learning in the lexical approach. In M. ...
  • Lewis, M. (2008). Implementing the lexical approach: Putting theory into ...
  • Little, D. (1994). Words and their properties: arguments for a ...
  • Mirzaei, A., Hashemian, M., & Azizi Farsani, M. (2016b). Lexis-based ...
  • Mirzaei, A., Rahimi Domakani, M., & Rahimi, S. (2016a). Computerized ...
  • Mirzaei, M., Meshgi, K., Akita, Y., & Kawahara, T. (2017). ...
  • Mobahat, F. (2001). The relationship between vocabulary learning strategies and ...
  • Moudrana, O. (2001). Lexical approach to second language teaching. Applied ...
  • Nagy, W. E. & Herman, P. (1987). Breadth and depth ...
  • Nattinger, J.R. (1980). A lexical phrase grammar for ESL. TESOL ...
  • Nattinger, J.R. & DeCarrico, J.S. (1992). Lexical phrases and language ...
  • Nation, I. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston: Heinle and ...
  • O'Keeffee, A., McCarthy, M. & Carter, C. (2007). From corpus ...
  • Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to ...
  •  Pavesi, M. (2012). The potentials of audio-visual dialogs for second ...
  • Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for ...
  • Pressley, M. (1987). The mnemonic keyboard method. Review of Educational ...
  • Qasim Hameed, J. (2002). The lexical approach between grammar and ...
  • Robinson, P. (2011). Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, ...
  • Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial ...
  • Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical ...
  • Side, R. (1990). Phrasal verbs: Sorting them out. ELT Journal, ...
  • Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ...
  • Sinclair, J. & Renouf, A. (1988). A lexical syllabus for ...
  • Tabachnick, B. G., and Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate ...
  • Taguchi, N. (2007). Chunk learning and the development of spoken ...
  • Taguchi, N. (2008). Building language blocks in L2 Japanese: Chunk ...
  • Talavan, N., and Javier, M. (2014). La  subtitulación  en  el ...
  • Tomasello, M. (2000). The item-based nature of children’s early syntactic ...
  • Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of ...
  • Tschirner, E. (2001). Language acquisition in the classroom: The role ...
  • Wei, L, & Ying, H. (2011). On the role of ...
  • Willis, D. (1990). The lexical syllabus: A new approach to ...
  • Willis, D., (1993). Grammar and lexis: some pedagogical implications. In J.M. Sinclair, ...
  • Wood, D. (2006). Uses and functions of formulaic sequences in ...
  • Wood, D. (2010). Formulaic language and second language speech fluency: ...
  • Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H. (1998). Second language ...
  • Wray, A. (2000). Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principles ...
  • Wray, A.(2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon.         Cambridge: Cambridge University ...
  • Xu, L. (2010). A correlation study on lexical chunks and ...
  • Zhao, Y. (2009). The effect of listeners' control of speech ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع