Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Class II Cavities Restored with a Low Shrink Silorane Resin Composite and a Methacrylate Based Composite Using two Different Techniques (Total Bonding and Open Sandwich)

Background and Objective: Polymerization shrinkage in composite resins is responsible for microleakage restoration. A recently introduced composite resin Filtek P۹۰ is based on siloxanes and oxiranes which polymerize by cationic "ring opening" polymerization resulting in reduced polymerization shrinkage. The aim of this study was comparative evaluation of microleakage in class II cavities restored with a silorane resin composite (Filtek P۹۰) or a methacrylate based composite (Z۲۵۰) using two different techniques of total bonding and open sandwich. Materials and Methods: A class II cavity was prepared on the mesial and distal surfaces of twenty four caries-free premolars, with the gingival margin of the cavity being ۱ mm under CEJ. Teeth were assigned to restorative material and operative techniques (total bonding, open Sandwich (resin composite, RMGI), to four groups of ۱۲ cavities: I: silorane-based composite (Filtek P۹۰) II: RMGI (Fuji II) & Filtek p۹۰ III: methacrylate based composite (Z۲۵۰) IV: RMGI & Z۲۵۰. The restored teeth were examined for microleakage after thermocycling) ۵-۵۵°c) and immersion, in a basic fuchin ۰.۵% solution (۲۴ hours) and sectioned with diamond disk, using stereomicroscope (۲۰X). The degree of dye penetration was recorded and analyzed with SPSS۱۶ and Fisher’s exact test. Results: Differences between group I with other groups were significant (P<۰.۰۱). Group III showed most microleakage in the degree of dye penetration ۲. No significant difference was observed in groups II, I and IV. Conclusion: Open sandwich technique (groups I, IV) and p۹۰ composite (total bonding) in group I showed the least microleakage. References ۱- Türkün LS, Aktener BO, Ateş M. Clinical evaluation of different posterior resin composite materials: a ۷-year report. Quintessence Int. ۲۰۰۳ ۳۴(۶): ۴۱۸-۲۶. ۲- Herrero AA, Yaman P, Dennison JB. Polymerization shrinkage and depth of cure of packable composites. Quintessence Int. ۲۰۰۵ ۳۶(۱): ۲۵-۳۱. ۳- Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS, Ferracane JL. Microleakage of four Class II resin composite insertion techniques at intraoral temperature. Quintessence Int. ۱۹۹۷ ۲۸(۲): ۱۳۵-۴۴. ۴- Bala O, Uçtasli MB, Unlü I. The leakage of Class II cavities restored with packable resin-based composites. J Contemp Dent Pract. ۲۰۰۳ ۴(۴): ۱-۱۱. ۵- Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Curing contraction of composites and glass-ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent. ۱۹۸۸ ۵۹(۳): ۲۹۷-۳۰۰. ۶- Suliman AH, Boyer DB, Lakes RS. Polymerization shrinkage of composite resins: comparison with tooth deformation. J Prosthet Dent. ۱۹۹۴ ۷۱(۱): ۷-۱۲. ۷- Neiva IF, de Andrada MA, Baratieri LN, Montiero S, Ritter AV. An in vitro study of the effect of restorative technique on marginal leakage in posterior composites. J Oper Dent. ۱۹۹۸ ۲۳(۶): ۲۸۲-۹. ۸- Bagis YH, Baltacioglu IH, Kahyaogullari S. Comparing microleakage and layering methods of silorane-based resin composite in wide class II MOD cavities. Oper Dent. ۲۰۰۹ ۳۴(۵): ۵۷۸-۸۵. ۹- Chen HY, Manhart J, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Polymerization contraction stress in light-cured packable composite resins. J Dent Mater. ۲۰۰۱ ۱۷(۳): ۲۵۳-۹. ۱۰- Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Lindberg M. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities. J Dent. ۲۰۰۷ ۳۵(۲): ۱۲۴-۹. ۱۱- Tjan AH, Bergh BH, Lidner C. Effect of various incremental techniques on the marginal adaptation of class II composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent. ۱۹۹۲ ۶۷(۱): ۶۲-۶. ۱۲- Duarte S Jr, Dinelli W, da Silva MH. Influence of resin composite insertion technique in preparations with a high C-factor. Quintessence Int. ۲۰۰۷ ۳۸(۱۰): ۸۲۹-۳۵. ۱۳- Duarte S Jr, Saad JR. Marginal adaptation of Class ۲ adhesive restorations. Quintessence Int. ۲۰۰۸ ۳۹(۵): ۴۱۳-۹. ۱۴- Andersson IE, Van JW, Horstedt P. Modified class II open sandwich restorations: Evaluation of interfacial adaptation and influence of different restorative techniques. Eur J Oral Sci. ۲۰۰۲ ۱۱۰(۳): ۲۷۰-۵. ۱۵- Dietrich T, Lösche AC, Lösche GM, Roulet JF. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine. J Dent. ۱۹۹۹ ۲۷(۲): ۱۱۹-۲۸. ۱۶- Al-Boni R, Raja OM. Microleakage evaluation of silorane based composite versus methacrylate based composite. J Conserv Dent. ۲۰۱۰ ۱۳(۳): ۱۵۲-۵. ۱۷- Yamazaki PC, Bedran AK, Pereira PN, Swift EJ. Microleakage evaluation of a new low-shirinkage composite restorative material. Oper Dent .۲۰۰۶ ۳۱(۳): ۶۷۰-۶. ۱۸- Palin WM, Fleming GJ, Nathwani H, Burke FJ, Randall RC. In vitro cuspal deflection and microleakage of maxillary premolars restored with novel low-shrink dental composites. Dent Mater. ۲۰۰۵ ۲۱(۴): ۳۲۴-۳۵. ۱۹- Ernst CP, Galler P, Willer SB, Haller B. Marginal integrity of class V restorations:SEM versus dye penetration. Dent Mater. ۲۰۰۸ ۲۴(۳): ۳۱۹-۲۷. ۲۰- Bogra P, Gupta S, Kumar S. Comparative evaluation of microleakage in class II cavities restored with Ceram X and Filtek P-۹۰: An in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent. ۲۰۱۲ ۳(۱): ۹-۱۴. ۲۱- Khoroushi M, Mansouri T, Bentolhoda K, Mazaheri H. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer and composite resin restoration: effect of resin etch-and-resine and self-etch adhesive. Indian J Den Res. ۲۰۱۲ ۲۳(۳): ۳۷۸-۸۳. ۲۲- Floriţa Z, Romînu M, Sinescu C, Haiduc C, Kigyosi A. The microleakage in open-sandwich class II restorations. Euro Cells Mat. ۲۰۰۶ ۱۱(۲): ۲۳. ۲۳- Gao BT, Lin H, Han JM, Zheng G. polymerization characteristics, flexural modulus and microleakage of siliran based and methacrylate based composites. Am J Dent. ۲۰۱۱ ۲۴(۲): ۹۷-۱۰۲. ۲۴- International organization for standardization. specification of dentistry resin-based filling materials. ISO ۴۰۴۹, ۲۰۰۳. ۲۵- Papadogiannis D, Kakaboura A, Palaghias G, et al. Setting characteristics and cavity adaptation of low-shrinking resin composites. J Dent Mater. ۲۰۰۹ ۲۵(۱۲): ۱۵۰۹-۱۶. ۲۶- Fahmy MZ, Moustafa Farrag N. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques. J Clin Pediatr Dent. ۲۰۱۰ ۳۵(۲): ۱۷۳-۱۸۲. ۲۷- Hedge MN, Hedge N, Hedge ND. Microleakage of silorane-based resin composite in comparison with methacrylate- based composite in class II open sandwich restorations: An in vitro study. Word J Dent. ۲۰۱۲ ۳(۲): ۱۴۵-۹. ۲۸- Dhingra V, Taneja S, Kumar M, Kumari M. Influence of Fiber Inserts, Type of composite, and gingival margin location on the microleakage in class ii resin composite restorations. Oper Dent. ۲۰۱۴ ۳۹(۱): E۹-۱۵. ۳۳ksksksk. ۲۹- Loguercio AD, Alessandra R, Mazzocco KC. Microleakage in class II composite resin restorations:total bonding and open sandwich technique. J Adhes Dent. ۲۰۰۲ ۴(۲): ۱۳۷-۴۴. ۳۰- Aboushala A, Kugel G, Hurley E. Class II composite resin restorations using glass-ionomer liners: Microleakagestudies. J Clin Pediatr Dent. ۱۹۹۶ ۲۱(۱): ۶۷-۷۰. ۳۱- Gladys S, Van MB, Braem M, Lambrechts P. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res. ۱۹۹۷ ۷۶(۴): ۸۸۳-۹۴. ۳۲- Hallett KB, Garcia F. Microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations: An in vitro study. J Dent Mater. ۱۹۹۳ ۹(۵): ۳۰۶-۱۱. ۳۳- Andersson- IE, van JW, Kieri C. Durability of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with resin-modified glass ionomer cement after ۶ years. Am J Dent. ۲۰۰۴ ۱۷(۱): ۴۳-۵۰.

Keywords:

Keywords: Microleakage , Resin composite , Glass ionomer , Siloran , Methacrylate