Readiness for Change in the Relationship between Abusive Supervision and Innovative Self-efficiency of Employees of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

Publish Year: 1396
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 108

This Paper With 13 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JHD-6-2_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 8 خرداد 1400

Abstract:

Background: The negative behaviors and abuse of supervisory tasks have negative consequences for employees and organizations. One of these consequences is reduction of readiness for change and innovation capability in organizations. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the role of readiness for change in the relationship between abusive supervision and innovative self-efficiency of employees of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in ۲۰۱۵. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study using path analysis. In this study, ۲۱۶ employees of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences were selected using random sampling. The research questionnaires included abusive supervision, readiness for change, and innovative self-efficiency of employees that their reliability and validity were approved. Data were analyzed using SPSS ۲۲, Lisrel ۸.۵۰, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and simple and multiple regressions. Results: The results showed that abusive supervision had a significant negative effect on different aspects of readiness for change (P<۰.۰۰۰۱). Emotional readiness for change had a significant positive effect on employees’ innovative self-efficiency (P<۰.۰۰۰۱) and played a mediation role in the relationship between abusive supervision and employees’ innovative self-efficiency. Conclusion: Since innovation leads to changes in the organization; therefore, employees should be prepared for these changes in advance. This preparation can be increased or decreased by the supervision methods used by the managers and their supervisory behaviors.

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Yang C, Zhang Q, Ding S. An evaluation method for ...
  • Shakeri F, Taheri Mehrjardi MH, Dehghan Dehnavi H, Kavandi R. ...
  • Kim TT, Lee G. Hospitality employee knowledge-sharing behaviors in the ...
  • de Jong J, Hartog DN. Innovative work behavior: measurement and ...
  • Suárez D. Persistence of innovation in unstable environments: Continuity and ...
  • Dörner N. Innovative work behavior: the roles of employee expectations ...
  • Lin YT, Han XP, Wang BH. Dynamics of human innovative ...
  • Dincer H, Gencer G, Orhan N, Sahinbas K. The significance ...
  • Bowditch JL, Bruono AF. A primer on organizational behavior. NewYork: ...
  • Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. ...
  • Weiner BJ. A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implemetation ...
  • Heard BD. The impact of affective commitment to organizational readiness ...
  • Rafferty A E, Jimmieson NL, Armenakis AA. Change Readiness: A ...
  • Shea CM, Jacobs SR, Esserman DA, Bruce K, Weiner BJ. ...
  • Jafari P, Kalanaki M. Relationship between the dimensions of learning ...
  • Alas R, Vadi M, Demirer H, Bilgin N. Readiness to ...
  • Alas R. The Impact of Work-Related Values on the Readiness ...
  • Paré G, Sicotte C, Poba-Nzaou P, Balouzakis G. Clinicians' perceptions ...
  • Saldana L, Chapman JE, Henggeler SW, Rowland MD. The Organizational ...
  • Fuller B F, Rieckmann T, Nunes E V, Miller M, ...
  • Holt DT, Helfrich CD, Hall CG, Weiner BJ. Are you ...
  • Tepper B. Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal. ...
  • Pyc LS. The Moderating Effects of Workplace Ambiguity and Perceived ...
  • Harris KJ, Harvey P, Kacmar KM. Abusive supervisory reactions to ...
  • Mawritz MB, Mayer DM, Hoobler JM, Wayne SJ, Marinova SV. ...
  • Onyishi IE. Abusive Supervision and Prosocial Organizational Behavior: A study ...
  • Mackey JD, Ellen BP, Hochwarter WA, Ferris GR. Subordinate social ...
  • Zhang H, Kwan HK, Zhang X, Wu LZ. High Core ...
  • Liu D, Liao H, Loi R. The dark side of ...
  • Francesco M, Carlo O, Adalgisa B. Explaining the relationships among ...
  • Tan HH, Tan CS. Toward the differentiation of trust in ...
  • Yang N. The impact of the organizational innovation on strategic ...
  • Agbim KC, Oriarewo GO, Omattah AE. An exploratory study of ...
  • Lee SD. Support for innovation in HBCUs: Exploring associations with ...
  • Bloir KL. A study of Ohio state university extension employees’ ...
  • Shah N, Irani Z. Examining employee attitudes and behaviours towards ...
  • Farr-Wharton R, Brunetto Y. Organizational relationship quality and service employee ...
  • Wanberg CR, Banas JT. Predictors and outcomes of openness to ...
  • Bouckenooghe D, Devos G, van den Broeck H. Organizational Change ...
  • Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social ...
  • Lohrbach S. Northern California Training Academy; ۲۰۱۱. [cited ۲۰۱۵ Dec ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع