QUALITY ASSURANCE IN ASSESSMENT SYSTEM OF MEDICAL COLLEGES OF PAKISTAN: FACULTY PERSPECTIVE “A QUALITATIVE STUDY”

Publish Year: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 186

This Paper With 7 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_FMEJ-11-2_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 20 تیر 1400

Abstract:

 Background: The study aimed to describe the procedures implemented by medical colleges in Pakistan to assure quality in their assessment system. Method: A qualitative study was conducted from March ۲۰۱۵-December ۲۰۱۷ in medical colleges of Pakistan using grounded theory design. The medical colleges were selected by using non-probability convenient sampling technique. Out of the total ۹۳ PMDC (Pakistan Medical and Dental Council) recognized medical colleges, ۴۹ were selected from all four provinces of Pakistan as well as Azad Kashmir. An open-ended questionnaire was filled by one faculty member from each participating medical college after obtaining informed consent. Data was analyzed using SPSS version ۲۱ (IBM). Results: Majority participants appreciated their institution’s assessment policy and wished improvement in terms of comparability to national organization’s assessment systems. For about ۱/۳rd of participants developing standardized tools, their grading (e.g. SEQs), and faculty’s unwillingness to devote time for quality MCQ were the challenges. Recommendations by > ۱/۳rd to overcome barriers included one assessment per year, improvement in teaching methods, standardized assessment, and structured viva exams. In >۱/۲ institutions no audit of assessment process was conducted. Around ۱/۳rd confirmed audit was an irregular unplanned activity and no report published. Around ۱/۴th of participants highlighted that a formal audit report stemmed in improving teaching & examination methods. Conclusions: Overall Quality Assurance (QA) procedures in assessment system in Pakistan were poorly implemented. Lack of QA and Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E), feedback mechanism, benchmarks for assessors, and formal auditing was noted. Student’s involvement, & semester system was recommended.

Authors

Nighat Murad

Pakistan Health Research Council, Head office, Islamabad, Pakistan

Farah Memon

Pakistan Health Research Council, Head office, Islamabad, Pakistan

Saima Naz

Pakistan Health Research Council, Head office, Islamabad, Pakistan

Tayyaba Rahat

Pakistan Health Research Council, Head office, Islamabad, Pakistan

Sumera Naz

Pakistan Health Research Council, Head office, Islamabad, Pakistan

Faiza Bashir

Pakistan Health Research Council, Head office, Islamabad, Pakistan

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Joshi MA. Quality assurance in medical education. Indian J Pharmacol. ...
  • Sallis E. Total quality management in education: Routledge; ۲۰۱۴ ...
  • Mishra S. Quality assurance in higher education: An introduction: National ...
  • Anaper C, Nihan S, Ulucay D, Cabuk A. Accreditation of ...
  • Colby J WM. Defining Quality in Education. United Nations Children's ...
  • LCME accreditation guidelines for new and developing medical schools May ...
  • Şandru IMD. Dimensions of quality in higher education-some insights into ...
  • Rose K. Project Quality Management: Why, what and how: Plantation, ...
  • Kalolo JF. Improving the quality of science education in Tanzanian ...
  • Outcomes and standards for undergraduate medical education: Tomorrow’s Doctors. General ...
  • Epstein RM. Assessment in medical education. New England journal of ...
  • Hodges B. Assessment in the post-psychometric era: learning to love ...
  • Raupach T, Brown J, Anders S, Hasenfuss G, Harendza S. ...
  • Ivankova NV, Creswell JW, Stick SL. Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory ...
  • Pakistan Medical & Dental Council. Recognized Medical Dental Colleges in ...
  • Marshall B, Cardon P, Poddar A, Fontenot R. Does sample ...
  • Fiaz M, Rani F, Saqlain M, Mahmood A, Shaiq PA, ...
  • Downing SM. Selected-Response Item Formats in Test Development. Handbook of ...
  • Shrivastava S. A study on academic appraisal program: An innovation ...
  • RaJ GA. Quality Assurance in Medical Education at GMC -۱۹۹۸-۲۰۰۸. ...
  • Memon MA, Joughin GR, Memon B. Oral assessment and postgraduate ...
  • Moghaddam AK, Khankeh HR, Shariati M, Norcini J, Jalili M. ...
  • Griewatz J, Simon M, Lammerding-Koeppel M. Competency-based teacher training: A ...
  • Harden RM. Outcome-based education: the future is today. Med teach. ...
  • Chong L, Taylor S, Haywood M, Adelstein B-A, Shulruf B. ...
  • Cobb KA, Brown G, Jaarsma DA, Hammond RA. The educational ...
  • Segers M, Martens R, Van den Bossche P. Understanding how ...
  • Al Kadri HM, Al-Moamary MS, Elzubair M, Magzoub ME, AlMutairi ...
  • Al Kadri HM, Al-Moamary MS, van der Vleuten C. Students' ...
  • Khan JJS, Biggs JS, Tabasum S, Iqbal M. Assessment in ...
  • Palmer EJ, Duggan P, Devitt PG, Russell R. The modified ...
  • Rush BR, Rankin DC, White BJ. The impact of item-writing ...
  • Shipton EE, Bate F, Garrick R, Steketee C, Visser EJ. ...
  • Al-Rubaish AM, Al-Umran KU, Wosornu L. An audit of assessment ...
  • Okeke TC, Anyaehie BU, Ugwu EO, Agu PU, Orizu I, ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع