Publisher of Iranian Journals and Conference Proceedings

Please waite ..
Publisher of Iranian Journals and Conference Proceedings
Login |Register |Help |عضویت کتابخانه ها
Paper
Title

Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Working Length Determination with Three Methods: Conventional Radiography, Digital Radiography and Raypex۶ Apex Locator: An Experimental Study

Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Working Length Determination with Three Methods: Conventional Radiography, Digital Radiography and Raypex۶ Apex Locator: An Experimental Study
Year: 1400
COI: JR_JDMT-10-2_004
Language: EnglishView: 96
This Paper With 7 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

Buy and Download

با استفاده از پرداخت اینترنتی بسیار سریع و ساده می توانید اصل این Paper را که دارای 7 صفحه است به صورت فایل PDF در اختیار داشته باشید.
آدرس ایمیل خود را در کادر زیر وارد نمایید:

Authors

Seyed Amir Mousavi - Assistant Professor of Endodontics, Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Amirali Zahedinejad - Resident of Endodontics, Endodontics Department, School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
Behzad Kowsari - General Denstist, Mashhad, Iran
Erfan Kolahdouzan - General Denstist, Isfahan, Iran
Seyed Iman Mousavi - Medical Student, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Sadegh Saeidian - General Dentist, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract:

Introduction: Determining working length had always been one of the most crucial factors in evaluating prognosis. Radiography as a gold standard way nowadays has some flaws like making a ۳D object, image distortion, not measuring the exact location of apical foramen, and putting the patient in a direct X-ray exposure. Here, we compare these three ways in measuring working length of single canal teeth that are narrow. Methods: Initially thirty single canal teeth with narrow canals were selected. After preparing the access cavity, the teeth were mounted in alginate for measuring working length with an apex locator. After that, they mounted in chalk in order to determine the working length using conventional and digital radiographs. Finally, the teeth were removed from the mount and the exact working length assessed using a hand file to compare with the three mentioned methods. Results: This study showed that the mean measured working length of root canal therapy had a significant difference between the four methods (P=۰.۰۰۳). Bonferroni post hoc test showed that the mean exact working length of root canal therapy was significantly lower than measured working length of root canal therapy by conventional radiography (P=۰.۰۰۲), digital radiography (P=۰.۰۰۱) and Raypex۶ apex locator (P=۰.۰۱). However, there was no significant difference between these three methods (P>۰.۰۵). Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the mean measured working length of root canal therapy had no significant difference between digital radiography, conventional radiography, and Raypex۶ apex locator but these three methods had a significant difference with the exact teeth length

Keywords:

Paper COI Code

This Paper COI Code is JR_JDMT-10-2_004. Also You can use the following address to link to this article. This link is permanent and is used as an article registration confirmation in the Civilica reference:

https://civilica.com/doc/1240741/

How to Cite to This Paper:

If you want to refer to this Paper in your research work, you can simply use the following phrase in the resources section:
Mousavi, Seyed Amir and Zahedinejad, Amirali and Kowsari, Behzad and Kolahdouzan, Erfan and Mousavi, Seyed Iman and Saeidian, Sadegh,1400,Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Working Length Determination with Three Methods: Conventional Radiography, Digital Radiography and Raypex۶ Apex Locator: An Experimental Study,https://civilica.com/doc/1240741

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :

  • Goldberg F, Marroquin BB, Frajlich S, Dreyer C. In vitro ...
  • Grove CJ. “Why Root Canals Should Be Filled to the ...
  • J Am Dent Assoc (۱۹۲۲). ۱۹۳۱;۱۸(۲):۳۱۴-۳۱۹ ...
  • Dutta K, Desai PD, Das UK, Sarkar S. Comparative evaluation ...
  • CHAPMAN CE. A Microscopic Study of the Apical Region of ...
  • Lin LM, Rosenberg PA, Lin J. Do procedural errors cause ...
  • Gutierrez JH, Brizuela C, Villota E. Human teeth with periapical ...
  • Bergenholtz G, Lekholm U, Milthon R, Engstrom B. Influence of ...
  • Seidberg BH, Alibrandi BV, Fine H, Logue B. Clinical investigation ...
  • Stein TJ, Corcoran JF. Radiographic “working length” revisited. Oral Surg ...
  • Pagavino G, Pace R, Baccetti T. A SEM study of ...
  • Williams CB, Joyce AP, Roberts S. A comparison between in ...
  • Friedlander LT, Love RM, Chandler NP. A comparison of phosphor-plate ...
  • Grayli E, Peyvandi A, Mallahi M, Naeemi S, Afshari E. ...
  • Hoseini Zarch SH, Heravi F, Javadian Langaroodi A, Pirgazi H. ...
  • Goldman M, Pearson AH, Darzenta N. Endodontic success—who's reading the ...
  • White SC, Pharoah MJ. White and Pharoah's Oral Radiology E-Book: ...
  • Green D. A stereomicroscopic study of the root apices of ...
  • DUMMER PM, McGINN JH, REES DG. The position and topography ...
  • Pishipati KVC. An in vitro comparison of Propex II apex ...
  • Hembrough JH, Weine FS, Pisano JV, Eskoz N. Accuracy of ...
  • Fouad AF, Reid LC. Effect of using electronic apex locators ...
  • Brunton PA, Abdeen D, Macfarlane TV. The effect of an ...
  • Smadi L. Comparison between two methods of working length determination ...
  • LAMBJERG-HANSEN H. Vital and mortal pulpectomy on permanent human teeth. ...
  • Mayeda DL, Simon JH, Aimar DF, Finley K. In vivo ...
  • Suzuki K. Experimental study on iontophoresis. Jpn J Stomatology. ۱۹۴۲;۱۶:۴۱۱-۴۲۹ ...
  • Sunada I. New method for measuring the length of the ...
  • Fouad AF, Krell KV, McKendry DJ, Koorbusch GF, Olson RA. ...
  • Fouad AF, Rivera EM, Krell KV. Accuracy of the endex ...
  • Kqiku L, Städtler P. Radiographic versus electronic root canal working ...
  • Kim E, Lee S-J. Electronic apex locator. Dent Clin North ...
  • Pratten DH, McDonald N. Comparison of radiographic and electronic working ...
  • Cohen S, Hargreaves KM. Pathways of the Pulp. ۹ [sup] ...
  • Jafarzadeh H, Beyrami M, Forghani M. Evaluation of conventional radiography ...
  • ElAyouti A, Kimionis I, Chu AL, Löst C. Determining the ...
  • Wrbas K, Ziegler A, Altenburger M, Schirrmeister J. In vivo ...
  • Vieyra J, Acosta J. Comparison of working length determination with ...
  • Orosco FA, Bernardineli N, Garcia RB, Bramante CM, Duarte MAH, ...
  • J Appl Oral Sci. ۲۰۱۲;۲۰(۵):۵۲۲-۵۲۵ ...
  • Kumar LV, Sreelakshmi N, Reddy ER, Manjula M, Rani ST, ...
  • Research Info Management

    Certificate | Report | من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

    اطلاعات استنادی این Paper را به نرم افزارهای مدیریت اطلاعات علمی و استنادی ارسال نمایید و در تحقیقات خود از آن استفاده نمایید.

    Scientometrics

    The specifications of the publisher center of this Paper are as follows:
    Type of center: علوم پزشکی
    Paper count: 4,522
    In the scientometrics section of CIVILICA, you can see the scientific ranking of the Iranian academic and research centers based on the statistics of indexed articles.

    Share this page

    More information about COI

    COI stands for "CIVILICA Object Identifier". COI is the unique code assigned to articles of Iranian conferences and journals when indexing on the CIVILICA citation database.

    The COI is the national code of documents indexed in CIVILICA and is a unique and permanent code. it can always be cited and tracked and assumed as registration confirmation ID.

    Support