Five Year Follow up of Retrospective Cohort Comparing Structural and Functional Outcome of Arthroscopic Single-row versus Double-row Suture Bridge Repair of Large Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tear in Patients Less than or Equal to ۷۰ Years
Publish place: The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery، Vol: 9، Issue: 4
Publish Year: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 274
This Paper With 8 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download
- Certificate
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_TABO-9-4_005
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 20 تیر 1400
Abstract:
Background: High re-tear rates after repairing large-sized posterosuperior rotator cuff tears remain a significantconcern which may affect the clinical outcome. The most optimal type of repair (single versus double-row suturebridge) suited for large size tear remains debatable.Methods: In a retrospective cohort study with a minimum of five years follow up, the structural and functional outcome of۱۰۳ patients with large size cuff tear repaired with single row (SR) or double row suture bridge (DRSB) were evaluated.The structural outcome was assessed with ultrasonography whereas functional outcome was evaluated with ConstantMurley (CM) and American shoulder elbow score (ASES).Results: There were ۵۵ patients in the SR group and ۴۸ patients in the DRSB group with a mean follow-up of ۷۴.۲months (range, ۶۰-۹۶ months). While comparing the structural integrity in two groups, we found significantly lower retearrates in the DRSB group as compared to the SR group (۱۰.۴% vs. ۳۲.۷%; P=۰.۰۰۶). Also, there were more focaldefects in the SR group (۲۵.۴%) than the DRSB group (۸.۳%). Overall, there was no significant difference in CM andASES scores when the SR group was compared to DRSB. However, subgroup analysis between those with intact andretorn tendon revealed significant difference (P=۰.۰۰۰۱) in the clinical scores.Conclusion: At a minimum of five years follow-up, the DRSB repair of large posterosuperior cuff tear resulted insuperior structural healing over SR repair. Nevertheless, overall there was no significant functional difference betweenboth the techniques. However, the functional outcome of the healed tendon subgroup was superior to retear tendonsubgroup.Level of evidence: III
Keywords:
Authors
Vivek Pandey
Department of Orthopedics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India
CJ Joseph
Department of Orthopedics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India
Naveen Mathai
Department of Orthopedics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India
Sandesh Madi
Department of Orthopedics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India
Lakshmikanth Gowda
Department of Orthopedics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India
Willems Jaap
Shoulder unit, Lairesse Kliniek, Valeriusplein, BG Amsterdam, The Netherlands
مراجع و منابع این Paper:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :