Nicola Massaro - Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo (PA) Italy.
Barbara Verro - Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo (PA) Italy.
Giuseppe Greco - Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo (PA) Italy.
Enzo Chianetta - Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo (PA) Italy.
Aurelio D&#۰۳۹Ecclesia - ENT and Maxillo-Facial Clinic, IRCSS – Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza – San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia (FG), Italy.
Carmelo Saraniti - Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo (PA) Italy.

Introduction: The loss of voice after total laryngectomy is one of the main impairments in personal and social life. In order to prevent potential psycho-social consequences in the patient and his family, the restoration of phonatory function is the main objective of post-laryngectomy rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to assess quality of life in patients who received prosthetic voice after total laryngectomy.   Materials and Methods: Over a one-year period, ۵۱ patients with voice prostheses after total laryngectomy were recruited. ۳۲ patients (۶۲.۷۴%) were administered radiation therapy and ۹ patients (۱۷.۶۴%) underwent to surgical reconstruction with flaps. Each patient was administered the VHI-۱۰ and V-RQOL self-assessment questionnaires.   Results: The study showed that vocal restoration with voice prosthesis allows patients to recover a significant degree of quality of life after total laryngectomy. The average score on the V-RQOL questionnaire was ۷۵.۹ and on the VHI-۱۰ questionnaire was ۱۳.۵. It has not been shown a statistically significant correlation between quality of life after tracheoesophageal prosthesis and radiation therapy, chemotherapy or reconstruction flaps. Younger patients showed, on average, a higher score at V-RQOL. These results allow to state that, after prosthetic rehabilitation, at least ۷۵% of patients experienced an increase in quality of life. Moreover, the prosthetic technique (primary vs secondary) does not affect the long-term outcome and radiotherapy, chemotherapy or reconstruction flaps are not absolute contraindications to rehabilitation with voice prosthesis.   Conclusion: After total laryngectomy, rehabilitation with tracheoesophageal prosthesis is a satisfactory choice to restore the patient’s ability to communicate verbally.

Quality of life, Prostheses, Voice quality, Laryngectomy