An Evidentiality-Discourse Analysis of Adverbials and Epistemic Modality in Discussion Sections of Native and Non-Native ELT Papers

Publish Year: 1396
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 104

This Paper With 15 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JMRELS-4-1_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 13 شهریور 1400

Abstract:

Integrating the triplex notion of evidentiality into its theoretical framework, this study aimed at contrastively scrutinizing the ELT academic papers authored by non-native Iranian and native English researchers in terms of the utilization of evidentiality, focusing on the adverbial and epistemic-modality types. To this end, the discussion sections of ۲۰ online papers were randomly selected from both groups. Then, postulating Ifantidou’s model (۲۰۰۱) as its analytical framework, this investigation identified the other evidentiality types in the collected corpora, and then classified them into appropriate subtypes based on the subcategories of the model. Furthermore, the frequency and the rate of evidentials in each group were compared and contrasted to see their rate differences. The findings indicated that the “adverbial” type of evidentiality enjoyed the first-ranked frequency, and the “epistemic modality” was the fourth frequently-used type of evidentiality in both native and non-native ELT papers. The other frequent types of evidentiality in these papers included “inferring,” “reported,” “memory,” and “propositional attitude,” respectively, which were not the types this study concentrated on. Finally, it was observed that there were subtle differences in both the degree and the way these authors draw evidentiality in their papers.

Authors

Manoochehr Jafarigohar

Associate professor in TEFL, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

Saeed Kheiri

PhD Candidate, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Adams, H., (۲۰۱۲). Sentential evidentials in English and Spanish medical ...
  • Anderson, L. (۱۹۸۶). Evidentials, paths of change and mental maps: ...
  • Barker, C., & Taranto, G. (۲۰۰۲). “The paradox of asserting ...
  • Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, ...
  • Bunton D. (۱۹۹۹). The use of higher level metatext in ...
  • Caliendo, G., & Compagnone, A., (۲۰۱۴). Expressing epistemic stance in ...
  • Chafe, W. (۱۹۸۶). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. ...
  • Chafe, W., & Nichols, J. (Eds.). (۱۹۸۶). Evidentiality: The linguistic ...
  • Conrad, S., & Biber, D. ( ۲۰۰۰). Adverbial marking of ...
  • Crismore, A. (۲۰۰۳). Metadiscourse: What is it and how is ...
  • Crismore A., & Farnsworth, R. (۱۹۸۹). Mr. Darwin and his ...
  • Dahl T. (۲۰۰۴). Textual metadiscourse in research articles: A marker ...
  • Dendale, P., & Tasmowski, L. (۲۰۰۱). Introduction: Evidentiality and related ...
  • Diewald, G., Kresic, M., & Smirnova, E. (۲۰۰۹). The grammaticalization ...
  • Drubig, H. B. (۲۰۰۱). On the syntactic form of epistemic ...
  • Fairclough, N. (۱۹۹۲). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press ...
  • Faller, M. (۲۰۰۲). Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco ...
  • Fang, H. M. (۲۰۰۶). Review of Evidential studies. Journal of ...
  • von Fintel, K. (۲۰۰۳). Epistemic modality and conditionals revisited. Talk ...
  • von Fintel, K., & Iatridou, S. (۲۰۰۲). The meanings of ...
  • Fuertes–Olivera, M., Velasco–Sacristan, A., Arribas–Btio, A., & Samaniego–Ferntidez, E. (۲۰۰۱). ...
  • Hengeveld, K. (۱۹۹۰). The hierarchical structure of utterances. In J. ...
  • Hunston, S. (۱۹۹۴). Evaluation and organization in a sample of ...
  • Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (۲۰۰۰). Evaluation in text. Oxford: ...
  • Hyland, K. (۱۹۹۸). Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic ...
  • Hyland, K. (۱۹۹۸). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: ...
  • Hyland, K. (۱۹۹۹). Talking to students: Metadiscourse in introductory course ...
  • Hyland, K. (۲۰۰۱). Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in ...
  • Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (۲۰۰۴). Metadiscourse in academic writing: ...
  • Ifantidou, E. (۲۰۰۱). Evidentials and relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins ...
  • Kanoksilapatham, B. (۲۰۰۵). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English ...
  • Lyons, J. (۱۹۷۷). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ...
  • Nuyts, J. (۲۰۰۱). Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization: A cognitive-pragmatic ...
  • Nwogu, K. N. (۱۹۹۷). The medical research paper: Structure and ...
  • Ochs, E. (Ed.). (۱۹۸۹). The pragmatics of affect. Special issue ...
  • Palmer, F. (۱۹۸۶). Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ...
  • Papafragou, A. (۱۹۹۸). The acquisition of modality: Implications for theories ...
  • Papafragou, A. (۲۰۰۰). Modality: Issues in the semantics-pragmatics interface. Amsterdam ...
  • Pederson, E., Danziger, E., Wilkins, D., Levinson, S., Kita, S., ...
  • Posteguillo, S. (۱۹۹۹). The schematic structure of computer science research ...
  • Speas, M. (۲۰۰۴). Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of ...
  • Schiffrin, D. (۱۹۸۰). Metatalk: Organizational and evaluative brackets in discourse. ...
  • Swales, J. M. (۱۹۹۰). Genre analysis: English in academic and ...
  • Sweetser, E. (۱۹۹۰). From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural ...
  • Thompson, D. (۱۹۹۳). Arguing for experimental facts in science. Written ...
  • van Valin, R., La Polla, R., (۱۹۹۷). Syntax: Structure, meaning ...
  • Vande Kopple, W. (۱۹۸۵). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College ...
  • Willett, T. (۱۹۸۸). A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticalization of ...
  • Wood, A. (۱۹۸۲). An examination of the rhetorical structures of ...
  • Zarei, G. R., & Mansoori, S. (۲۰۰۷). Metadiscourse in academic ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع