The Familiarity of EFL Teachers with Post-Method: Considering their Field of Study

Publish Year: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 112

This Paper With 22 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JMRELS-3-3_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 13 شهریور 1400

Abstract:

One important light in which to perceive the pendulum swings of the world of language teaching is the waning of the concept of method and its replacement by Kumaravadivelu’s post-method pedagogy, which is free from the constraints of methods. For several years, researchers working on the familiarity of EFL teachers with Post-method and its role in second and foreign language learners’ productions have pointed out that the opportunity to plan for a task generally contributes to language learners’ development. Such a post-method thinking has yet to find some prominent place with language teaching practitioners. This study principally sets out to explore any correlation between the field of study taught and the teachers’ attitudes towards the post-method strategies at hand today. One hundred and thirt one teachers from an English language institute located in Tabriz, Iran (i.e. Faseleh) were selected as participants. The attitudes of language teachers towards the Post-Method condition were assessed via a questionnaire that consisted of two main parts: the first part tapped into the participants’ personal information, and the second part included some questions on a ۵- point Likert scale about the role of Post Method, their familiarity with it, and how it impacted their teaching and learning. The findings support the hypothesis that language teachers’ knowledge and awareness of post-method seems to play out as an important factor in their teaching, while they also carry certain pedagogical and theoretical implications in second language teaching as well as relevance to second language learning assessment.  

Authors

Mir Habib Aboulalaei

Staff member of Tabriz University, Tabriz,

Jafar Poursalehi

Researcher in English Language Teaching, International Officer inUniversity of Tabriz, Tabriz

Yase Hadidi

Assistant Professor English Department Faculty of Farsi Literature University of Tabriz

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Alijani, L. (۲۰۱۲). Meta-discourse: Definitions, issues and its implications for ...
  • Al-Jadidi, H. (۲۰۰۹).The discourses and tales of Hong Kong scholars ...
  • Argyris, H., and Schön, J. (۱۹۷۴). Hedges and Boosters in ...
  • Auerbach, M.F. (۱۹۹۳). Going Against the Grain in Literary Studies.An ...
  • Baker, G. (۲۰۰۸). Planning and inter-language variation. Studies in Second ...
  • Barcelos, A. (۲۰۰۰). Building models of adult second-language writing instruction. ...
  • Batstone, F., & Ellis, R. (۲۰۰۹).The psychology of attention. Cambridge, ...
  • Birjandi, P., & Malmir, A. (۲۰۱۰). The effect of task-based ...
  • Borg, M. (۲۰۰۳). Effects of task repetition on the structure ...
  • Brown, P. (۲۰۰۱). Planning and inter-language variation. Studies in Second ...
  • Brown, G. and George, Y. (۱۹۹۸).Teaching the Spoken Language. Cambridge: ...
  • Cortazzi, D., & Jin, J. (۱۹۹۹). Creativity and narrative task ...
  • Daniels, S. M., &Perry, A. (۲۰۰۳).Stimulated recall methodology in second ...
  • Davis, G. (۲۰۰۳). Strangers in inter-language communication. London: Longman ...
  • Dekeyser, J. (۱۹۹۵). Task-based language learning and teaching. Frankfurt is ...
  • Eisner, F. (۱۹۸۵).Task-based language learning and teaching. New York: Oxford ...
  • Ellis, R. (۲۰۰۶). Inter-language variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting ...
  • Ellis, R. (۲۰۰۵). Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. ...
  • Fitch, J. L. (۲۰۰۴). Student feedback in the college classroom: ...
  • Hashemi, D., Long, M. and Krapels, A. R. (۲۰۱۳). An ...
  • Hu, L. (۲۰۰۲). Planning and focus on form in L۲ ...
  • Hussain, A. (۲۰۰۹).Gender & Hedging: From Sex Differences to Situated ...
  • Kagan, L. (۱۹۹۲). Hedging in College Research Papers: Implications for ...
  • Kashefian-Naeeini, S., SadatMousavi, H and Salehi, H. (۲۰۱۱). Teaching in ...
  • Kinichi, S. (۲۰۰۴).Epistemic Modality in English Popular Scientific Texts and ...
  • Krashen, D. W. (۱۹۸۲). Determining sample size for research activities. ...
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (۱۹۹۴).Teachers as intellectuals: Towards a critical pedagogy of ...
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (۲۰۰۳).Popular culture, schooling and everyday life. New York: ...
  • Long, U. (۲۰۰۳).The differential effects of three types of task ...
  • Long, U. (۱۹۸۹).The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and ...
  • MacBeath, E. (۱۹۹۹). Gender, Power, Discipline & Context: On the ...
  • Marc, I. &Melerdiercks, V. (۲۰۰۵).A Contrastive Analysis of the Use ...
  • Nassaji, L. &Fotos, G. (۲۰۰۴). Adverb placement in second language ...
  • Nunan, M. (۲۰۰۴).Classrooms with Wi-Fi. T.H.E. Journal, ۳۰(۱۴), ۱۷–۲۰ ...
  • Nunan, D. (۱۹۸۹). Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom, Cambridge: ...
  • Nunan, D. (۲۰۳۳). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ...
  • Nunan, D. (۱۹۹۱). Planned and unplanned discourse. In Givón, T. ...
  • Pajares, N. (۱۹۹۲). The effects of planning and self-efficacy on ...
  • Partee, N., &Lightbown, P. (۱۹۹۶). Instruction and the development of ...
  • Pederson, A. (۲۰۰۳).A Socio-Linguistic Study of the Classical British Sitcom ...
  • Pennycook, E. (۱۹۸۹). How to explore academic writing from meta-discourse ...
  • Prabhu, S. (۱۹۹۰). The effects of on-line and pre-task planning ...
  • Richards, M. (۲۰۰۳).Building an empirically-based model of EFL learners’ writing ...
  • Richards, M. J. (۱۹۹۰). Task based instruction. Language Teaching, ۳۶(۱), ...
  • Rudduck, J.,&Flutter, L. (۲۰۰۰). Critical examination of L۲ writing process ...
  • Schumann, N. (۱۹۷۸). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. ...
  • Skehan, P. (۱۹۹۶a). A framework for the implementation of task-based ...
  • Skehan, P. (۱۹۹۶b). A cognitive approach to language learning.Oxford: Oxford ...
  • Smith, L. (۱۹۹۶). Effects of prewriting discussions on adult ESL ...
  • Stern, N. (۱۹۹۱). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature ...
  • Stephens,M. (۲۰۰۵). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. ...
  • Stern, N. (۱۹۸۳). Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, ...
  • Veugelers, G., &de Kat, C. (۲۰۰۲).An investigation of effectiveness and ...
  • Weaver, K. &Nilson, U. (۲۰۰۵).The effects of different lengths of ...
  • Williams, S. and Burden, M. (۱۹۹۷). The influence of pretask ...
  • Willis, J. & Willis, K. (۲۰۰۷). Communicative language testing: Revolution ...
  • Yim, V. (۱۹۹۳). Composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six ...
  • Young, J. R. (۲۰۰۶). The Wght for classroom attention: professor ...
  • Yu, F. (۱۹۸۶).The effects of planning on language production in ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع