The effects of corrective feedback on Iranian EFL students' writing

Publish Year: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 205

This Paper With 19 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JMRELS-3-2_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 13 شهریور 1400

Abstract:

Matching the expectations of teachers and students is vital for successful learning. Few studies have investigated the effects of corrective feedback on Iranian EFL students. The sample of this research were ۱۸۰ male and female teachers that teach language courses in an English Language Teaching program in language institutes in Zanjan and ۳۵۰ students who were chosen through stratified random sampling. Two standard instruments were used in this study. PET Test, Fukuda (۲۰۰۴). The findings suggest that they believed that corrective feedback had a significant effect on their writing but the teachers did not think so. It is concluded that most of the feedback given by teachers were concentrated on grammatical errors and that the teachers’ view of feedback is based on the context, which might origin from absence of sufficient teacher training. With this in mind, giving feedback, or rather the right kind of feedback should perhaps play a better role in teacher education. Anyway, the fact that feedback is based on each context may be positive, because all students are different, even so teacher trainees might still take advantage from studying the provision of feedback.

Authors

Amir Rezaei

Islamic Azad University of Zanjan

Siros Izadpanah

Islamic Azad Unversity of Zanjan

Ali Shahnavaz

Islamic Azad university of Zanjan, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Akiyama, Y. (۲۰۱۷). Learner beliefs and corrective feedback in telecollaboration: ...
  • Diab, R. L. (۲۰۰۵). EFL university students’ preference for error ...
  • Diab, R. L. (۲۰۰۶). Error correction and feedback in the ...
  • Ellis, R. & Shintani, N. (۲۰۱۴). Exploring Language Pedagogy through ...
  • Ferris, D. (۱۹۹۹). The case for grammar correction in L۲ ...
  • Hamouda, A. (۲۰۱۱). A study of students and teachers' preferences ...
  • Harmer, J. (۲۰۰۱). Mistakes and feedback. The Practice of English ...
  • Hedgcock, J. and Lefkowitz, N. (۱۹۹۵). Feedback on feedback: Assessing ...
  • Komura, k. (۱۹۹۹). Student response to error correction in ESL ...
  • Knoblauch, C. H. & BRANNON, L. (۱۹۸۱). Teacher commentary on ...
  • Krashen, S. D. (۱۹۹۲). Comprehensible input and some competing hypotheses. ...
  • Lee, I. (۱۹۹۷). ESL learners' performance in error correction in ...
  • Journal of Second Language Writing, ۱۳(۴) ۲۸۵–۳۱۲. DOI: ۱۰.۱۰۱۶/j.jslw.۲۰۰۴.۰۸.۰۰۱Lee, I. ...
  • Lee, I. (۲۰۱۳). Research into practice: Written corrective feedback. Language ...
  • Norouzian, R. (۲۰۱۲). Written error feedback from perception to practice: ...
  • Robb, T., Ross, S. & Shortreed, I. (۱۹۸۶). Salience of ...
  • Sheen , Y., Wright, D. & Moldawa, A. (۲۰۰۹). Differential ...
  • Storch, N. (۲۰۱۰). Critical feedback on written corrective feedback research. ...
  • Truscott, J. (۱۹۹۷). Review article: The case against grammar correction ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع