Rationality for Engineers: Part I- Setting the scene

Publish Year: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 195

This Paper With 12 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJCOE-5-2_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 11 مهر 1400

Abstract:

The truly complex element of modern times is not the technology, but the engineers who develop, design, manufacture, and maintain it. An engineer’s job is to change/improve existing situations into more desirable ones, as well as to respond to the demands or needs of society. Engineers cannot wait until all phenomena and their implications are well understood. Engineers have worked for centuries solving problems with limited information and knowledge and are presumed to be rational decision-makers. Then, how do engineers make their decisions with limited knowledge, time, and cognitive capacity in a variety of domains? Engineers require understanding what part of information can be ignored, and what situations require fast, and timely response, resulting hopefully in a better decision by freeing cognitive capacity to make it.  A rational decision-maker should choose an option that maximizes the expected benefits (utilities), although there may be significant hurdles in achieving such goals, especially in emergencies where time pressure is acute.  To overcome these hurdles, most engineers revert to “rules-of-thumb”, also known as heuristics. Heuristics are experience-based methods of gut feelings that can be used as an aid to solve specific problems in a particular environment. Heuristics, however, are imperfect; thus, engineers must understand their limitations. Their applicability is also limited by the context under which they were derived as well as their fit with the environment of the problem at hand.  The overall objective of these four-part papers is to discuss heuristics and how they can make decision-making easier and faster for engineers. These papers also remind them of their own cognitive biases and describe ways of avoiding them. This first part aims to set the scene by providing background information. These papers address the type of rationality that engineers need to be effective build on the existing literature and liberally draws from them. Engineers cannot march on the spot while thinking for a solution, they must think while moving forward, thus there is a danger not starting on the right foot.

Authors

Sirous Yasseri

Brunel University, London

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Barros, G., (۲۰۱۰). Herbert A. Simon and the concept of ...
  • Battersby, M, and Bailin, S. (۲۰۱۸). Inquiry: A New Paradigm ...
  • Bazerman MH: Judgment in Managerial Decision-Making ۴th edition. New York: ...
  • Brown, S., and Salter, S. (۲۰۱۰). Analogies in science and ...
  • Chow GV, Czarny MJ, Hughes MT, Carrese JA. CURVES: a ...
  • Craik, K. (۱۹۴۳) work entitled The Nature of Explanation ...
  • Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M.W., Nordgren, L.F., and van Baaren. R.B., ...
  • Forrester, J. W. (۱۹۷۱) Counterintuitive behaviour of social systems. Technology ...
  • Gigerenzer, G. (۲۰۰۸). Why Heuristics Work. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. ۲۰۰۸, ...
  • Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P.M., & the ABC Research Group., (۱۹۹۹), ...
  • Johnson-Laird, P.N. (۱۹۸۳). Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of ...
  • Johnson-Laird, P.N. (۲۰۰۶) How We Reason. Oxford University Press۱۴. Johnson-Laird, ...
  • Kahneman, D. ۲۰۱۱. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Macmillan ...
  • Klein, G. (۱۹۸۹). Strategies of decision making. Military Review, ۵۶, ...
  • Klein, G. (۱۹۹۳). A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid ...
  • Kelman, M. (۲۰۱۱). The Heuristics Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press ...
  • Koen, B. V. (۲۰۰۳). Discussion of the Method Conducting the ...
  • Murray, S.R. (۱۹۹۷), ' Deliberate Decision Making by Aircraft Pilots: ...
  • Neustadt, R, and May, E (۱۹۸۶) Thinking in Time: The ...
  • Siegel, H. (۱۹۸۰). Critical Thinking as an Educational Ideal, The ...
  • Simon, H. A. (۱۹۵۶). Rational choice and the structure of ...
  • Simon, H., (۱۹۸۳). Reason in Human Affairs, Stanford University Press; ...
  • Todd, P. M., Gigerenzer, G., and the ABC Research Group ...
  • Yasseri, S., (۲۰۱۴), Application of systems engineering to subsea development, ...
  • Zajonc, R. B. (۱۹۸۰), Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع