Collapse Safety Margin in Iranian Seismic Design Code: Case Studies of RC Frame Structures

Publish Year: 1396
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 159

This Paper With 10 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JSEE-19-1_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 8 آبان 1400

Abstract:

According to the modern seismic design codes, the structural collapse is a catastrophic state which is not acceptable, even under very rare earthquakes. Hence, evaluation of collapse safety margin for structures design based on code requirements is very important. The paper tackles this issue considering RC frame structures designed according to Iranian seismic standard (Standard ۲۸۰۰). Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) is carried out using ۲۲ natural ground motion records. The study includes RC moment resisting frames with ۳, ۶ and ۱۰ stories considering two types of soil classifications (Type II and III) and two alternatives of ductility levels (intermediate and high), as defined in standard ۲۸۰۰. It is concluded that while all structures on the sites with soil class II demonstrate sufficient margin against collapse, taller structures on soil class III show lower than acceptable collapse margin. It is also noted that the collapse margin is generally reduced with the increased height of the structure.

Keywords:

Collapse Margin Ratio (CMR) , Incremental Dynamic Analyses (IDA) , RC Frames , Iranian Seismic Standard

Authors

Ali Reza Manafpour

Urmia University, Urmia

Maryam Tohidian

Urmia University, Urmia

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • FEMA (۲۰۰۹) Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors. FEMA P-۶۹۵, ...
  • May, A. (۲۰۱۱) Assessment of seismic design response factors of ...
  • Haselton, C.B., Liel, A.B., and Deierlein, G.G. (۲۰۱۰) Example application ...
  • NIST (۲۰۱۰) Evaluation of the FEMA P-۶۹۵ Methodology for Quantification ...
  • ۹۱۷-۸, Gaithersburg, MD ...
  • Mahmoudi, M. and Ghasem Abdi, M. (۲۰۱۲) Evaluating response modification ...
  • Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (۲۰۰۲) Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake ...
  • FEMA (۲۰۱۱) Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors: Component Equivalency ...
  • Kircher, C.A. and Heintz, J.A (۲۰۰۸) ATC-۶۳-recommended methodology for quantification ...
  • BHRC (۲۰۰۵) Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistance Design ...
  • American Concrete Institute (۲۰۱۱) Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete ...
  • Baker, W., Besjak, C., Sarkisian, M., Lee, P., and Doo, ...
  • Donovan, L. and Memari, A. (۲۰۱۱) Deter-mination of Seismic Performance ...
  • FEMA (۲۰۰۴) NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New ...
  • Farahi, M. and Mofid, M. (۲۰۱۳) On the quantification of ...
  • Zsarnoczay, A. (۲۰۱۳) Influence of plastic mechanism development on the ...
  • CSI (۲۰۱۱) SAP۲۰۰۰ v-۱۵.۰: Integrated Software for Structural Analysis and ...
  • Tohidian, M. and Manafpour, A.R. (۲۰۱۴) Investigating the behaviour factor ...
  • ASCE (۲۰۰۷) Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings. ASCE Standard ASCE/SEI ...
  • Management and Planning Organization (۲۰۰۷) Instruction for Seismic Rehabilitation of ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع