ناشر تخصصی کنفرانس های ایران

لطفا کمی صبر نمایید

Publisher of Iranian Journals and Conference Proceedings

Please waite ..
Publisher of Iranian Journals and Conference Proceedings
Login |Register |Help |عضویت کتابخانه ها
Paper
Title

The Effects of Self-Editing Versus Peer-Editing on Iranian EFL Learners’ Critical Thinking Skills

Year: 1400
COI: ICLP06_127
Language: EnglishView: 79
This Paper With 29 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

Buy and Download

با استفاده از پرداخت اینترنتی بسیار سریع و ساده می توانید اصل این Paper را که دارای 29 صفحه است به صورت فایل PDF در اختیار داشته باشید.
آدرس ایمیل خود را در کادر زیر وارد نمایید:

Authors

S.Dariush Ahmadi - English Department, Faculty of Humanities, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran
Ali Gholami Mehrdad - English Department, Faculty of Humanities, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran.
Akram etemadi۳ - English Department, Faculty of Humanities, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran.

Abstract:

Despite a large number of studies pinpointing the role of writing as an effective tool for language learning, little is known about the effect of different types of editing in writing on critical thinking skills. This study attempted to investigate the impact of two major types of editing (self-editing vs peer-editing), on critical thinking skills of Iranian EFL learners. To do so, a quasi-experimental method with pretest-posttest control group design was used. A total of ۷۴ intermediate female students from a high school in Hamedan, Iran were selected out of a whole available population of ۹۰ students through a Nelson test (۲۰۰A). Subsequently, they were divided into two experimental PE (n=۲۴) and SE (n=۲۵) groups and one control group (n=۲۵). This study was held for ten sessions that included one pre-test session, eight editing sessions for experimental groups, and a session dedicated to the post-test. The Watson- Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (Watson & Glaser, ۱۹۸۰) was administered twice to all three groups, as the pre-test and post-test. All groups were taught the same material and received similar instruction ecept that the SE group was also instructed on how to edit their own drafts of writing; and the PE group was taught how to edit their partners’ pieces of writing. Analysis of ANCOVA revealed a significant difference between these three groups. Both experimental groups outperformed the control group with the self-editing group showing a better performance than the peer-editing group. The findings seem to have implications for both teachers and materials developers

Keywords:

Paper COI Code

This Paper COI Code is ICLP06_127. Also You can use the following address to link to this article. This link is permanent and is used as an article registration confirmation in the Civilica reference:

https://civilica.com/doc/1312081/

How to Cite to This Paper:

If you want to refer to this Paper in your research work, you can simply use the following phrase in the resources section:
Ahmadi, S.Dariush and Gholami Mehrdad, Ali and etemadi۳, Akram,1400,The Effects of Self-Editing Versus Peer-Editing on Iranian EFL Learners’ Critical Thinking Skills,Sixth International Conference on Language, Literature, History and Civilization,https://civilica.com/doc/1312081

Research Info Management

Certificate | Report | من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

اطلاعات استنادی این Paper را به نرم افزارهای مدیریت اطلاعات علمی و استنادی ارسال نمایید و در تحقیقات خود از آن استفاده نمایید.

New Papers

Share this page

More information about COI

COI stands for "CIVILICA Object Identifier". COI is the unique code assigned to articles of Iranian conferences and journals when indexing on the CIVILICA citation database.

The COI is the national code of documents indexed in CIVILICA and is a unique and permanent code. it can always be cited and tracked and assumed as registration confirmation ID.

Support