Impact of Recasts and Prompts on the Learning of English Third Person Singular Marker by Persian Learners of English

Publish Year: 1392
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 108

This Paper With 14 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JFL-1-2_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 13 آذر 1400

Abstract:

Based on the controversial beliefs among L۲ teachers about effective corrective feedback (CF) strategies, recast and prompts as ۲ kinds of CF have drawn the attention of L۲ researchers(e.g., Braidi, ۲۰۰۲; Iwashita, ۲۰۰۳; Loewen & Philp, ۲۰۰۶; Panova & Lyster, ۲۰۰۲; Sheen, ۲۰۰۴). Despite these numbers of studies, debate continues to exist about their usefulness as a CF technique. Whereas recasts provide a correct reformulation of L۲ learners’ nontarget utterance, the other alternative type of feedback in L۲ classroom settings is referred to as prompts (Lyster, ۲۰۰۴) because they provide signals that prompt L۲ learners to self-repair rather than provide them with a correct reformulation of their nontarget utterance. Hence, the focus of this study was to examine the effect of recasts in comparison to prompts on the learning of English third person singular marker “s” by Iranian preintermediate L۲ learners. Two CF techniques of recasts and prompts were utilized in ۲ experimental groups in response to their errors in using the correct form of the verb for third person singular subject. In the third group as the control group, No-CF was provided by the L۲ teacher. The results revealed that the Prompts Group had outperformed the Recast Group and No-CF Group. Thus, it could be concluded that prompts as a CF strategy led to more gains than CF that provided the L۲ learners with the correct form (recast) than No-CF.  

Authors

Ali Akbar Jafarpour

Assistant Professor, Department of Foreign Languages, Shahrekord University

Mahmood Hashemian

Assistant Professor, Department of Foreign Languages, Shahrekord University

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Aljaafreh, A., &Lantolf, J. (۱۹۹۴).Negative feedback as regulation and second ...
  • Allwright, R. L. (۱۹۷۵). Problems in the study of the ...
  • Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (۲۰۰۶). One size fits all? ...
  • Braidi, S.M. (۲۰۰۲). Reexamining the role of recasts in native-speaker/nonnative- ...
  • Corder, S. (۱۹۶۷). The significance of learner’s errors. International Review ...
  • Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (۱۹۹۸). Communicative focus on form. ...
  • Ellis, R. (۲۰۰۷). The differential effects of corrective feedback on ...
  • Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (۲۰۰۶). Implicit and ...
  • Ellis, R., & Sheen, Y. (۲۰۰۶). Re-examining the role of ...
  • Farrar, M. J. (۱۹۹۰). Discourse and the acquisition of grammatical ...
  • Farrar, M. J. (۱۹۹۲). Negative evidence and grammatical morpheme acquisition. ...
  • Gass, S., &Varonis, E. M. (۱۹۹۷). Input, interaction, and second ...
  • Han, Z. (۲۰۰۲). A study of the impact of recasts ...
  • Havranek, G. (۲۰۰۲). When is corrective feedback most likely to ...
  • Hendrickson, J.M (۱۹۷۸). Error correction in foreign language teaching: Recent ...
  • Iwashita, N. (۲۰۰۳). Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based ...
  • Krashen, S. D. (۱۹۸۲). Principles and practice in second language ...
  • Leeman, J. (۲۰۰۳). Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative ...
  • Long, M. H. (۲۰۰۶). Recasts in SLA: The story so ...
  • Long, M., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (۱۹۹۸). The role ...
  • Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (۱۹۹۸). Focus on form: ...
  • Lyster, R. (۱۹۹۸). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction ...
  • Lyster, R. (۲۰۰۴). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in ...
  • Lyster, R., & Izquierdo, J. (۲۰۰۹).The effects of prompts versus ...
  • Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (۱۹۹۷). Corrective feedback and learner ...
  • Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (۱۹۹۸). Conversational interaction and second ...
  • Nelson, K. E., Denninger, M., Bonvillian, J. D., Kaplan, B., ...
  • Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (۲۰۰۱). Recasts as ...
  • Ohta, A. S. (۲۰۰۰). Rethinking recasts: A learner-centered examination of ...
  • Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (۲۰۰۲). Patterns of corrective feedback ...
  • Philp, J. (۲۰۰۳). Constraints on “noticing the gap”: Nonnative speakers’ ...
  • Schmidt, R. (۲۰۰۱). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and ...
  • Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (۱۹۸۶). Developing basic conversational ability ...
  • Sheen, Y. (۲۰۰۴). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative ...
  • Sheen, Y. (۲۰۰۶). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts ...
  • Truscott, J. (۱۹۹۶). The case against grammar correction in L۲ ...
  • Van Lier, L. (۱۹۹۸). The relationship between consciousness, interaction and ...
  • Vigil, N. A., & Oller, J. (۱۹۷۶). Rule fossilization: A ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع