The Nasal Smear for Eosinophils, Its Value, and Its Relation to Nasal Mucosal Eosinophilia in Allergic Rhinitis

Publish Year: 1389
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 109

This Paper With 6 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJOTO-22-3_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 11 بهمن 1400

Abstract:

Introduction: There is no single test as a gold standard for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis (AR). The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness and validity of nasal smear as a quick, easy and inexpensive diagnostic method for diagnosis of allergic rhinitis. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted in a university hospital setting. Nasal smears were taken from ۳۹ patients with a clinical history of nasal allergy and a positive skin prick test to at least one aeroallergen as well as ۲۶ controls without any history and negative test. Biopsy specimens from the inferior turbinate as well as nasal smears of ۱۹ cases including ۹ patients and ۱۰ controls with the same criteria were taken. Nasal smears and biopsy slides were stained with Giemsa and Hematoxilin-Eosin and were examined blindly by two separate pathologists. Results: Fifty one percents of the patients and ۱۱.۵% of the controls showed eosinophilia in their nasal smear (≥۱۰% eosinophils, P=۰.۰۰۱). The sensitivity of nasal eosinophil count as a diagnostic test for AR was ۵۱.۳% with a specificity of ۸۸.۵%, a positive predictive value of ۸۷% and a negative predictive value of ۵۴%. Eosinophilia in nasal biopsies was found in ۴۴% and ۳۰% of allergic patients and controls respectively. There was no significant correlation between symptoms or positive skin tests with either smear eosinophilia or tissue eosinophilia. Conclusion: Evaluation of eosinophils in nasal smear is an insensitive but fairly specific test for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis. It seems that the nasal secretions and nasal tissue represent two distinct cellular compartments.

Authors

Mehdi Bakhshaee

Ear, Nose, Throat Research Center, Department of otorhinolaryngolgy , Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Mohammad Fereidouni

Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran

Mehdi Farzadnia

Department of pathology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Abdol-Reza Varasteh

Immunology Research Center, Department of immunobiochemistery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran