Seyed Aboozar Falsafizadeh Haghighi - Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

BackgroundJohn Rawls' Theory of Justice can be discussed and documented as a widely used theory during the second decade of the third millennium. In this field, one can never speak about Justice and neglect the theory.Materials and MethodsThe method of present is descriptive-analyitical which has been written by using the main works of john Rawls in the field of moral principle of Justice and other moral principles. In addition to these Sources, other scientific texts and articles, Persian and Latin books, and Sources have also been used.Ethical ConsiderationsThe article is independent and free writing.FindingsThe passing society of today needs to refer to the ideas of John Rawls to search for new examples and concepts of Justice. Rawls imagines people as the owners of ideas and understanding of the concept of Justice and theorizes that using a series of firm documents and inferences of passing from the moral concept of Justice toward political and legal concepts.ConclusionThe main purpose of this study is to provide summarized criticism on some special political perceptions in Iran's history to change the special perceptions of Justice mostly relevant to concepts such as guardianship, piety, and morality, into a new perception of Justice. Such perception should meet the least needs of citizens, and explain the inequalities in special cases properly. 

Justice, individual, institutional, Rawls, Ghazali