Investigating Iranian EFL Learners' Negotiation Types in Writing with Different Scaffolding Patterns

Publish Year: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 129

This Paper With 16 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_LGHOR-6-1_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 10 خرداد 1401

Abstract:

Learner-centered approaches in second language acquisition and process approach in writing pedagogy has stimulated quite a number of researchers to focus on learners' voices in collaboration passing through multiple drafts and revisions. This study based on the concept of scaffolding learning in Vygotsky's sociocultural theory and process writing approach to second language writing investigated Iranian EFL learners’ negotiation types in small groups of different scaffolding patterns; symmetrical and asymmetrical. To this end, ۱۵ students at High and Low Intermediate Proficiency levels were assigned into three groups in different scaffolding patterns; one asymmetrical group with two High Intermediate - three Low Intermediate learners (H-L), two symmetrical groups with five High Intermediate learners (H-H), another with five Low Intermediate learners (L-L). Small group interactions were observed and recorded. Transcriptions were analyzed to identify negotiation types in terms of language functions among different groups. Therefore, two main categories, Responding and Requesting and their subcategories were found. The subcategories of ''agreeing'', ''explaining'', ''giving opinions'', ''instructing'', ''restating'' and'' suggesting'' were related to the first main category; ''comprehension checking'', ''eliciting opinions'' and ''questioning ''were related to the second main category. According to Chi-square test results, negotiation types were significantly related to the scaffolding pattern as the asymmetrical (H-L) group was superior in the number of language functions used over the symmetrical (L-L, H-H) groups. Nevertheless, members in all groups enjoyed high equality and mutuality in interaction. The findings suggest teachers raise learners' awareness of the diverse strengths and abilities that different scaffolding patterns give them.

Authors

عایشه محمدزاده

PhD Candidate, Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

توران آهور

Assistant Professor, Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

مهناز سعیدی

Associate Professor, Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Baleghizadeh, S., TimcheMemar, H., & TimcheMemar, A. (۲۰۱۰). The effect ...
  • Ellis, R. (۲۰۰۰). Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching ...
  • Fung, M. Y. (۲۰۰۶). The nature and dynamics of collaborative ...
  • Graham, S., & Sandmel, K. (۲۰۱۱). The process writing approach: ...
  • Li, M., & Kim, D. (۲۰۱۶). One wiki, two groups: ...
  • Memari Hanjani, A., & Li, L. (۲۰۱۴). Exploring L۲ writers’ ...
  • Rijlaarsdam, G., & Van den Bergh, H. (۲۰۰۶). Writing process ...
  • Shortreed, I. M. (۱۹۹۳). Variation in foreigner talk input: The ...
  • Soleimani, M., Modirkhamene, S., & Sadeghi, K. (۲۰۱۵). Peer-mediated vs. ...
  • Vygotsky, L. (۱۹۷۸). Mind in society: The development of higher ...
  • Watanabe, Y. (۲۰۰۸). Peer-peer interaction between L۲ learners of different ...
  • Yu, R. (۲۰۰۸). Interaction in EFL classes. Asian Social Science, ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع