Neonatal Outcomes of Fetuses with Isolated or Multiple Soft Markers in Ultrasound Screening

Publish Year: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 237

This Paper With 7 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IRJN-13-2_010

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 21 خرداد 1401

Abstract:

Background: There is still controversy on the importance of soft markers on the fetus and neonatal outcomes. This study aimed to determine the mentioned outcomes in the fetuses with soft markers detected by ultrasound screening. Methods: This prospective study was conducted on ۴۶۱ pregnant women who were referred to the prenatal clinics of hospitals affiliated with the Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, in ۲۰۲۱. The study outcomes included incidence of abortion, preterm birth (PTB), cesarean section (CS), low birth weight (LBW), neonatal admission rates, and neonatal mortality. Results: The most frequent soft marker in the present study was echogenic intra-cardiac foci (EIF) (۳۲.۵%), followed by choroid plexus cyst (CPC) (۳۰.۶%), pyelectasis (۲۵.۲%), and echogenic bowel (EB) (۱۵.۸%), respectively. Spontaneous abortion, PTB, CS, LBW, neonatal department admission, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, stillbirth, and fetal distress, and death occurred in ۱۰ (۲.۱%), ۵۲ (۱۲.۵%),  ۳۱۶ (۷۶%), ۳۵ (۷.۶%), ۲۸ (۶.۷%),  ۴۲ (۱۰.۱%), ۱۳ (۳.۱%),  ۲۶ (۵.۶%), and one (۰.۲۴%) cases, respectively. Poor neonatal outcomes were significantly associated with EIF (P=۰.۰۰۷), CPC (P=۰.۰۴۵), echogenic bowel (P=۰.۰۳۱), pyelectasis (P=۰.۰۲۶), and single umbilical artery (P=۰.۰۱۰). In addition, the fetuses with synchronous CPC and IEF and also synchronous pyelectasis and IEF were at significantly higher risk of poor neonatal outcomes (P=۰.۰۳۷). Conclusion: The study results showed that although poor neonatal outcomes were associated with some soft markers, most fetuses with soft markers had desired outcomes in the absence of structural or chromosomal abnormality.    

Authors

Mahboobeh Shirazi

Maternal, Fetal, and Neonatal Research Center, Yas Complex Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Mona Taghavipour

Maternal, Fetal, and Neonatal Research Center, Yas Complex Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Behnaz Moradi

Department of Radiology, Yas complex Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Department of Radiology, Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of

Fatemeh Sharafi

Maternal, Fetal, and Neonatal Research Center, Yas Complex Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Fatemeh Golshahi

Maternal, Fetal, and Neonatal Research Center, Yas Complex Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Behrokh Sahebdel

Maternal, Fetal, and Neonatal Research Center, Yas Complex Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Elham Feizabad

Maternal, Fetal, and Neonatal Research Center, Yas Complex Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Maria Nezamnia

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Bam University of Medical Sciences, Kerman,

Zahra Khazaeipour

Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Maryam Moshfeghi

Department of Endocrinology and Female Infertility, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, ACECR, Tehran, Iran

Fatemeh Sharafi

Cellular and Molecular Biology Department, Tehran Azad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Van den Hof MC, Wilson RD. Fetal soft markers in ...
  • Bethune M. Literature review and suggested protocol for managing ultrasound ...
  • Smith-Bindman R, Chu P, Goldberg JD. Second trimester prenatal ultrasound ...
  • Nicolaides KH. Nuchal translucency and other first-trimester sonographic markers of ...
  • Sethna F, Tennant PW, Rankin J, Robson S. Prevalence, natural ...
  • Salomon LJ, Bernard JP, Ville Y. Reference ranges for fetal ...
  • Viaux-Savelon S, Dommergues M, Rosenblum O, Bodeau N, Aidane E, ...
  • Kaplan R, Adams S. Incidental Fetal Ultrasound Findings: Interpretation and ...
  • Tosun M, Kurtoglu Ozdes E, Malatyalioglu E, et al. Long-Term ...
  • Levy DW, Mintz MC. The left ventricular echogenic focus: anormal ...
  • Achiron R, Lipitz S, Gabbay U, Yagel S. Prenatal ultrasono-graphic ...
  • Simpson JM, Rowlands ML, Sharland GK. The significance of echogenic ...
  • Lehman CD, Nyberg DA, Winter TC III, Kapur RP, RestaRG, ...
  • Cai M, Huang H, Xu L, Lin N. Classifying and ...
  • Prabhu M, Kuller JA, Biggio JR. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine ...
  • Gupta G, Aggarwal S, Phadke SR. Intracardiac echogenic focus and ...
  • Shakoor Shafia, Ismail Humera, Munim Shama. Intracardiac echogenic focus and ...
  • Tosun M, Kurtoglu Ozdes E, Malatyalioglu E, Yavuz E, Celik ...
  • Masihi S, Barati M, Karimi Moghaddam E, Rezazadeh A, Ronaghi ...
  • Cai M, Lin N, Chen X, Fu M, Guo N, ...
  • Buiter HD, Holswilder-Olde Scholtenhuis MA, Bouman K, et al. Outcome ...
  • De Oronzo MA. Hyperechogenic fetal bowel: an ultrasono- graphic marker ...
  • Gupta G, Aggarwal S, Phadke SR. Intracardiac echogenic focus and ...
  • Ekin A, Gezer C, Taner CE, et al. The effect ...
  • Dagklis T, Plasencia W, Maiz N, Duarte L, Nicolaides KH. ...
  • Kim MS, Kang S, Cho HY. Clinical significance of sonographic ...
  • Abbott MB, Vlasses CH. Nelson textbook of pediatrics. Jama. ۲۰۱۱;۳۰۶(۲۱):۲۳۸۷-۸ ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع