Haider Sami Rashid - University of Kerbala, College of Law , Iraq
Ahmed Khashan Al Hashemi - University of Kerbala, College of Law, Iraq

The objection of president of state ( whether in parliamentary or presidential system) to the draft laws is considered one of the rights that occupies a great importance, given it is a traditional right to the president in the parliamentary and presidential systems alike. But this right witnesses a large different between systems that grant it to the president. Where the bills are constituting through the constitutional systems and their internal regulations that are eager to statement what the draft laws are going through. But, sometimes, the parliament overcomes on the objection through the majority that has been specified by the constitution, which enables it pass the draft laws. Also, the constitutional jurisprudence have differed over the eligibility or not of president of state with regard to his objection to the laws. Where, some believe that this right is as an explicit violation to the separation of powers principle, in case the president abuse his power , it will lead to obstacle passing the important laws. Thus, it becomes a means of standing up to the legislative authority and passing the draft laws. For this purpose, the comparative and descriptive method have been employed for analyses various constitutions texts in order to resolve the research problem

President, Objection, Constitution, Draft laws.