زهرا نقوی - دانشجوی دکترا رشته فلسفه و کلام اسلامی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس- تهران- ایران
رضا اکبریان - استاد گروه فلسفه , و کلام اسلامی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس- تهران- ایران

According to philosophical principles, causal necessity is necessary to prove the flow of causality in all matters from the burden of transcendence to the finest cases of the universe. Apparently, this rule is in conflict with some obvious intellectual and conscientious issues, which has questioned the generality and sometimes the basis of the correctness of this rule. Conscientious objection is one such case as opposed to causal necessity. In the present article, the conflict between the rule of necessity and free will has been studied by analytical-logical method according to the principles of segregation of thought .From the point of view of the companions of separation, the basis for distinguishing the general principle of causality with concepts such as necessity and authority is the search for causality in the homeland. By referring to the self, it becomes clear that basically such an implication does not exist between causality and necessity, and by getting rid of this improper implication, the way will be opened to solve the problem of authority. The school of segregation say The two-sided essence of authority is the key to solving the puzzle. And by accepting the exception in the causal necessity in a negative way; That is, in the case of voluntary actions, they deny the possibility of the realization of the oyster, but without this exception, they consider it impossible to prove the authority.

اختیار, ضرورت علی, دوسویگی, قدرت, مشیت, صدفه