Masoud Farahmandfar - Assistant Professor of English Literature, Department of English, Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, Allameh Tabataba&#۰۳۹;i University, Tehran, Iran, ORCID ID: ۰۰۰۰-۰۰۰۱-۸۱۹۴-۶۷۱۹
Ghiasuddin Alizadeh - Assistant Professor of English Literature, Department of English, Faculty of Literature and the Humanities, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran, ORCID ID: ۰۰۰۰-۰۰۰۲-۴۱۱۹-۲۲۵۱

Shelley’s “Hymn to Intellectual Beauty” has suffered a critical overlook compared with the immense bulk of studies dedicated to his poetical and philosophical works. The reason behind the poem’s resistance to understanding is that it stands in stark contrast to Shelley’s theological and philosophical opinions which he held throughout his life. Shelley's poem is torn between the need for a transcendental signified which would bestow meaning on human existence and the tragic realization that no such an ultimate guarantee can ever exist, that the lack in the Other is ontological and, as such, can never be compensated for. Availing itself of the theories of Slavoj Žižek, the present article argues that Shelley’s illusion is twofold: besides his opinion that a full access to Beauty will eradicate uncertainty and inconstancy from the human life, he locates the roots of the present universal discontent and suffering in the absence of the Spirit, rather than seeking the causes of failure in the very essential defectiveness of the symbolic reality.

Shelley, “Hymn to Intellectual Beauty”, Romanticism, Žižek, Ideological Sublime