Comparative CT Study on Syndesmosis Mobility after Static or Dynamic Fixation for Ankle Fractures with Syndesmotic Rupture: A Pilot Study

Publish Year: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 161

This Paper With 10 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_TABO-10-8_008

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 21 مرداد 1401

Abstract:

Background: The objective of this prospective randomized pilot study is to compare, by computed tomography (CT), the mobility of syndesmosis after static fixation (SF) or dynamic fixation (DF) in ankle fractures with syndesmotic rupture (AFSR) in adults, and to compare this mobility with that of healthy ankles.Methods: Forty-two patients with an AFSR were randomized to ۲ groups: SF (N=۲۱) or DF (N=۲۱). Seven patients were lost to follow-up. Ultimately, ۳۵ patients (SF, N=۲۰; DF, N=۱۵) were analyzed. The clinical results were assessed with the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society scale. To assess syndesmosis mobility, CT in ۳۰° of plantar flexion (PFlex) and ۲۰° of dorsal flexion (DFlex) was performed on both ankles one year after the fracture. Four parameters were measured: anterior tibiofibular distance, posterior tibiofibular posterior distance, angle of fibular rotation (AFR), and anteroposterior fibular translation. Results: The AFR between DFlex and PFlex was more similar to the non-affected side in the DF group. The other three parameters showed no statistical differences between types of fixation. The mean loss of AFR compared with the non-affected side was ۱.۲° in the SF group and ۰.۱° in the DF group. No clinical differences between the SF group and the DF group were found. No correlation between clinical and radiological results was observed.Conclusions: The AFR was more similar to the non-affected side in the DF group. However, this finding did not correlate with a better clinical result. Keywords: Ankle; Fracture; Syndesmosis mobility; Static fixation; Dynamic fixation; CT scan Level of Evidence II: Prospective cohort study.

Authors

Aitor Ibarzabal-Gil

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, La Paz University Hospital-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain

Elena Galvez-Srvent

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Infanta Elena University Hospital, Valdemoro, Madrid, Spain

Jose M. Martinez-Diez

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, La Paz University Hospital-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain

Javier Pallares-Sanmartí

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, La Paz University Hospital-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain

Carlos Kalbakdij-Sanchez

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, La Paz University Hospital-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain

Sarah Mills

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, La Paz University Hospital-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain

Juan C. Rubio-Suarez

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, La Paz University Hospital-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain

Enrique Gil-Garay

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, La Paz University Hospital-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain

E. Carlos RODRIGUEZ-MERCHAN

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, La Paz University Hospital-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain- Osteoarticular Surgery Research, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research, IdiPAZ (La Paz University Hospital, Autonomous University of Madrid), Madrid,