Echocardiographic Assessment of the Aortic Stenosis Valve Area: Parameters and Outcome

Publish Year: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 104

This Paper With 8 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JMCH-5-7_017

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 12 شهریور 1401

Abstract:

Background: Among individuals who have a stenotic aortic valve, a precise assessment of aortic valve area is essential for clinical judgment. So far, no studies have been conducted to investigate and assess the role of the three dimensional echo-cardiography in the assessment of the valve stenosis. This study aims to compare and assess the precision of the measurement of the stenosis area of the aortic valve by ۲D versus ۳D echo-cardiography.Method: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in Baghdad Medical City, Ministry of Health in Iraq from the ۱st December ۲۰۲۱ to the ۱st June ۲۰۲۲. Aortic valve area was calculated in a cross-sectional study by using transthoracic echo-Doppler, continuity equation, and ۳D and ۳D/۲D planimetr.Results: ۳۳ patients with aortic stenosis were examined. AVA analysis of correlation and absolute agreement revealed the agreement was high and the absolute differences were minimal across all planimetric methods: ۳D vs. ۳D/۲D: ۰.۹۱۳ (۰.۸۲۹–۰.۹۵۷); ۲D vs. ۳D/۲D: ۰.۷۴۷ (۰.۵۳۷–۰.۸۶۹). For AVA evaluation, the correlation coefficient r between ۳D and ۲D was (۰.۹۰۲) and (۰.۷۲۹), respectively. The observer variability was equal for all approaches, while the ۳D inter-observer variability was higher than for ۲D techniques (p = ۰.۰۳۶).Conclusion: The ۳D/۲D echo techniques for AVA planimetry agreed with the traditional ۲D methodology and flow-derived methods. When compared with ۲D AVA on the principle of continuity equation, the ۳D approach was at least as excellent as the ۲D method and had a greater repeatability. Using ۳D Echo in the evaluation of aortic valve area is a not-invasive procedure leading to the AS quantitative assessment that is accurate and reliable.

Authors

Ameen Abdulhasan Al Alwany

Deputy Dean for Administrative Affairs, College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, ۱۰۰۰۱, Baghdad, Iraq

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :