A Retrospective Evaluation of Iranian Third-Grade Junior High School English Textbook

Publish Year: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 176

This Paper With 17 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JNTELL-1-2_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 17 مهر 1401

Abstract:

This study evaluated the third-grade junior high school English course book in Iran which was implemented in ۲۰۱۷ by the ministry of education. The study was done in order to find out whether its contents match the authors' claim. To do this, the researcher used a quantitative research design to evaluate the Course Book (CB). A sample of ۲۰۰ teachers participated in this study for answering the questionnaire and were chosen randomly from a different state and private schools in Mazandaran province. They participated in the online and paper and pencil survey. The survey was developed by Cunnings Worth (۱۹۹۵). The items of the questionnaire were based on the characteristic of a good textbook and included ۱۴ categories as content, grammar, vocabulary, phonology, language skills, methodology, study skills, objectives, content selection, gradation and recycling, visuals, practices and testing, supplementary materials and teacher manual. In short, the results indicated that Prospect ۳ was perceived as moderately adequate since the mean composite scores for each category exceeded ۲, except for gradation and recycling which scored ۲.۱۰. Gradation and recycling and study skills categories were two categories that scored a mean of ۲.۱۳ and ۲.۱۰. They gained the least support by the respondents. 

Authors

Elham TAghipour

Department of English Language Teaching, Qaemshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qameshahr, Iran

Shaban Najafi Karimi

Department of English Language Teaching, Qaemshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qaemeshahr, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (۱۹۵۶). Taxonomy of educational objectives handbook: ...
  • Cunnings worth, A. (۱۹۹۵). Choosing your Coursebook. Macmillan Heineman ...
  • Darali, G. (۲۰۰۷). Pragmatics dimension in Spectrum textbooks. Unpublished master’s ...
  • Gordani, Y. (۲۰۱۰). A content analysis of guidance school English ...
  • Grant, M. (۱۹۸۷). Making the Most of Your Textbook. In ...
  • Halliday, M. (۱۹۷۵). Learning How to Mean. London: Edward Arnold ...
  • Hutchinson, T. & Torres, E. (۱۹۹۴). The textbook as agent ...
  • Iraji, A. (۲۰۰۷). Pragmatic features of New Interchange: How communicative ...
  • Jahangard, A. (۲۰۰۷). The evaluation of the EFL materials taught ...
  • Kamyabi Gol, A. (۲۰۱۵). Critical Analysis and Teachers’ Perspectives on ...
  • Kheirabadi, R., & Alavi Moghaddam, S. B. (۲۰۱۴). New horizons ...
  • Leech, G. N. (۱۹۸۳). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman ...
  • Littlejohn, A. (۱۹۹۸). The analysis of language teaching materials: Inside ...
  • Matreyek, W. (۱۹۹۰). Communicating In English Examples Models, And Functions. ...
  • Rashidi, N., & Bahrami, M. (۲۰۱۲). An In-depth Evaluation of ...
  • Razmjoo, S.A. (۲۰۰۷). High schools or private institutes textbooks? Which ...
  • Searle, J.R. (۱۹۷۶). Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ...
  • Thomas, J. (۱۹۸۳). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, ۴, ۹۱-۱۱۲ ...
  • Tomlinson, B. (۲۰۰۳). Developing Materials for Language Teaching. London, Cromwell ...
  • ZareMoayedi, I. (۲۰۰۷). An in-depth evaluation of Interchange series (۳rd ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع