Breast Carcinoma – A Comparative Study of Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization for Her-۲ Assessment and Association of ER, PR, HER-۲ and Ki-۶۷ Expression with Clinico-Pathological Parameters

Publish Year: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 107

This Paper With 8 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJP-17-4_007

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 30 آبان 1401

Abstract:

Background & Objective: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in developed and developing countries. This study mainly addresses the issue of an equivocal result in IHC, which then needs further assessment if the patient has to receive targeted therapy. The study aimed to detect the expression of Her۲/neu protein in breast cancer by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH) and evaluate concordance and discordance between the two methods. Also, the clinicopathological parameters in these patients were studied in association with ER, PR, HER-۲, and Ki-۶۷.Methods: This study was conducted on ۳۴ female carcinoma breast specimens, including core biopsies and mastectomies. Each case underwent histopathological and immunohistochemical studies for (Estrogen Receptor) ER, (Progesterone Receptor) PR, (Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor ۲) HER-۲, and Ki-۶۷. In addition, FISH was done on all the samples to detect Her۲ gene amplification.Results: The overall concordance between the two tests was ۷۹.۴۱% while the concordance between the two tests in equivocal cases, was ۱۴.۳%. ER/PR expression and HER-۲ amplification were inversely associated. Also, Ki-۶۷ expression was not associated with the side size of the lesion, lymphovascular invasion, and lymph node metastasis. Age less than ۵۰ at presentation and infiltrating ductal carcinoma histological type showed increased proliferation index.Conclusion: The highest concordance between FISH and IHC was noted in IHC positive and negative cases, whereas IHC equivocal cases showed low concordance. FISH accurately determines the assessment of HER۲ expressions in equivocal cases. 

Keywords:

Authors

Sajitha K

Department of Pathology, K S Hegde Medical Academy, NITTE (Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India

Meenakshi Arumugam

KSHEMA Centre for Genetic Services, K S Hegde Medical Academy NITTE (Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India

Jayaprakash Shetty

Department of Pathology, K S Hegde Medical Academy, NITTE (Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India

Reshma Shetty

KSHEMA Centre for Genetic Services, K S Hegde Medical Academy NITTE (Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India

Ritu Asnani

Department of Pathology, K S Hegde Medical Academy, NITTE (Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India

Prashanth Shetty

۲. KSHEMA Centre for Genetic Services, K S Hegde Medical Academy NITTE (Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Mathur P, Sathishkumar K, Chaturvedi M, Das P, Sudarshan KL, ...
  • Payandeh M, Sadeghi M, Sadeghi E, Koohian AK. Comparison of ...
  • Ghosh J, Gupta S, Desai S, Shet T, Radhakrishnan S, ...
  • Mostafa NA, Eissa SS, Belal DM, Shoman SH. Assessment of ...
  • Fusun T, Semsi A, Cem U, Mevlut T, Zafer K, ...
  • Inwald EC, Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Hofstädter F, Zeman F, Koller M, ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع