Petroleum storage management using multi-criteria decision making approach

Publish Year: 1391
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 1,352

This Paper With 7 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ICOGPP01_280

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 22 مرداد 1391

Abstract:

Selecting an appropriate site to construct petroleum storage is a significant decision in petroleum industry. Decision making on this issue depends on various quantitative and qualitative criteria which are in conflict with each other in some cases. Therefore, multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods could be used to solve this problem. In this study, the influential criteria for selecting an appropriate site including: Feeding, Distribution, Safety, Environmental, Geotechnical properties, tectonic properties, access to water and Cost, were considered and with collecting the expert opinions, the weight of each criterion was determined. Then, the areas surrounding Iran’s Mahdasht city were studied, and four potential sites were proposed. After that, these sites were studied using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method, and finally, the most optimal site was selected.

Authors

Jahangir Khazaei

Assist. Prof. of Civil Eng., Dept. of Civil Eng., Razi Univ., Kermanshah, Iran

Yasser Minatour

M.Sc. Student of Water Eng., Dept. of Civil Eng., Razi Univ., Kermanshah, Iran

Mohsen Safari

Instructor of Mining Eng., Dept. of Mining Eng., Birjand Univ. of Technology, Birjand, Iran

Mohammad Ataei

Prof. of Mining Eng., Dept. of Mining Eng, Shahrood Univ. of Technology, Shahrood, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Pohekar, S. D, R amachandran , M, 2004, Application of ...
  • Benayoun, R., Roy, B., Sussman, N., 1966, Manual de reference ...
  • 160 4.0) 4.155 4.155 4.0) 4.154 4.160 4.155 ...
  • Hyde, K.M., Maier, H.R., Colby, C.B., 2005, A distance-based uncertainty ...
  • _ Cagno, E., Caron, F., Mancini, M., Ruggeri, F., 2000, ...
  • Pakdin Amiri, M., 2010, Project selection for oil- fields development ...
  • Mokhtarian, M.N., 2011, A new fuzzy weighted average (FWA) method ...
  • Krohling, R.A., Campanharo, V.C., 2011, Fuzzy TOPSIS for group decision ...
  • Yang, M., Khan, F.I., Sadiq, R., 2011, Prioritiz ation of ...
  • Environmental Protection, 89, pp. 22-34. ...
  • Lee, A.H.I., Chen, W., Chang, C., 2008, A fuzzy AHP ...
  • manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Syst. Appl., 34, pp. 96-107. ...
  • Safari, M., Ataei, M., Khalokakaie, R., Karamozian, M., 2010, Mineral ...
  • Note De Synthese et Formaton, No. 25, Direction Scientifique SEMA, ...
  • Roy, B. Bertier, P., 1973, La methode Electre II: Une ...
  • Roy, B., 1978, ELECTRE III: un algorithme _ classement fonde ...
  • Saaty, T.L., 1980, The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York. ...
  • Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K., 1981, Multiple attribute decision making. S ...
  • Brans, J.P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B., 1986, How to select ...
  • Deng, J.L., 1989, Introduction to grey system theory. The Journal ...
  • Janssen, R., 1996, Multiobjective Decision Support for Environmentl Management. Kluwer ...
  • Opricovic, S., 1998, Multi-criteria optimization of civil engineering Systems, Faculty ...
  • Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.H., 2002, Multicriteria sustainable ...
  • reconstruction, Comput-Aided. Civil. Infrastruct. Eng., 17, pp. 211-220. ...
  • Cooper, W.W., Sieford, L.M., Tone, K., 2000, Data Envelopment Analysis: ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع