Afsaneh Tehranian - Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Arash Women’s Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Akram Ghahghaei-Nezamabadi - Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Arash Women’s Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Maryam Motiei Langeroudi - Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Arash Women’s Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Reyhaneh Aghajani - School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Background & Objective: We compared two different methods of visual inspection of the cervix, including Visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA) and Visual inspection of the cervix with Lugol's iodine (VILI) in terms of sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of pre-malignant cervical lesions in comparison to colposcopy guided biopsy.Materials & Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a total number of ۲۰۰ women who were referred to the colposcopy clinic of Arash women’s hospital (Tehran, Iran) for cervical cancer screening, underwent VIA, VILI, and colposcopy guided biopsy during ۲۰۱۸-۲۰۱۹.Results: The calculated sensitivity and specificity of VIA and VILI in this population were (۱۰۰% and ۶۹.۵%) and (۱۰۰% and ۶۰%), respectively, whereas the sensitivity and specificity of both VIA and VILI tests in combination were ۱۰۰% and ۷۷.۲%. The positive and negative predictive values were ۳۲.۷% and ۱۰۰%, respectively, when combined form of VIA and VILI was applied in this population.Conclusion: VIA and VILI alone or in combination could be used as screening tests to evaluate the presence of cervical cancer and in case of positive results, supplementary tests such as colposcopy guided biopsy could be performed for definite diagnosis.

cervical cancer, Screening, Colposcopy