Mohammad Reza Azadeh - Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
Mohammad Parvaresh Masoud - Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
Mina Gaeeni - Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
Amir Hamta - Department of Biostatistics, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.

Background: The main task of the emergency medical system is to provide primary care and transfer the patients to hospital. Studies have been conducted to investigate the outcome of air and ground ambulance patients, but they show different results. These different results may be due to the type of study, statistical methods, differences in prehospital emergency systems, and insufficient control of confounding variables. Thus, it is difficult to compare and generalize the results. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of injured people transported by air and ground ambulance in road traffic accidents in Qom Province, Iran, during ۲۰۱۵-۲۰۱۹. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective analytical descriptive study, we used the numerical method and examined all road traffic accident patients transferred through ground or air to Qom Shahid Beheshti Hospital by the prehospital emergency from ۲۰۱۵ to ۲۰۱۹. The collected information included the type of transfer, age, sex, type of trauma, distance from the accident site to the hospital, initial vital signs, duration of the mission, and day of the accident. To control the confounding factors, we used propensity score matching. Outcomes studied included length of hospital stay, length of stay in the intensive care unit, duration of mechanical ventilation, and the need for immediate surgery. Logistic regression was used to analyze the need for immediate surgery and a generalized linear model for other consequences. Results: After matching, the number of patients in each group transferred by ground ambulances and helicopter was ۵۶۶. Trauma to the head (P=۰.۰۲۸) and back (P=۰.۰۰۲) were more common in helicopter-transported patients. The patients transported by helicopter had a longer time to reach the scene (۷.۷۰ ±۵.۱۸ min) (P<۰.۰۰۱), a shorter duration of presence on the scene (۱۲.۱۷±۸.۳۳ min) (P=۰.۰۴۱), and a shorter duration of transfer (۱۳.۱۲±۴.۷۵ min) (P<۰.۰۰۱) than the ground ambulance. There was no significant difference between the patients who transferred by ground and helicopter ambulance regarding the length of hospital stay in the intensive care unit (P=۰.۷۱۸), mechanical ventilation (P=۰.۵۰۷), and hospitalization (P=۰.۰۸۹). The need for immediate surgery in helicopter-transported patients was ۸۴.۸% higher than ground ambulance patients (۹۵%CI: ۰.۰۸۶-۰.۲۶۷; P<۰.۰۰۱). Conclusion: The patients transported by helicopter were not significantly different from ground ambulances transported patients regarding staying in the intensive care unit, mechanical ventilation, and hospitalization, but they more needed immediate surgery. If the patients are triaged adequately according to the type of injury and the level of consciousness at the scene and transferred to the appropriate hospital by ground or air, they can enjoy the benefits of the type of transfer.

Emergency medical services, Air ambulance, Accident, Traffic